[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Restrict sentinel requests further

Matthew Auld matthew.william.auld at gmail.com
Mon Mar 22 17:12:43 UTC 2021


On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 17:04, Tvrtko Ursulin
<tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>
> Disallow sentinel requests follow previous sentinels to make request
> cancellation work better when faced with a chain of requests which have
> all been marked as in error.

Could you elaborate some more on why this makes request cancellation
work better?

>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
> index 4c2acb5a6c0a..4b870eca9693 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
> @@ -896,7 +896,7 @@ static bool can_merge_rq(const struct i915_request *prev,
>         if (__i915_request_is_complete(next))
>                 return true;
>
> -       if (unlikely((i915_request_flags(prev) ^ i915_request_flags(next)) &
> +       if (unlikely((i915_request_flags(prev) | i915_request_flags(next)) &
>                      (BIT(I915_FENCE_FLAG_NOPREEMPT) |
>                       BIT(I915_FENCE_FLAG_SENTINEL))))
>                 return false;
> --
> 2.27.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list