[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dpcd_bl: Don't try vesa interface unless specified by VBT

[Lyude Paul]

On Tue, 2021-03-23 at 16:06 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Actually-NAK this. I just realized I've been misreading the bug and that
> > this
> > doesn't actually seem to be fixed. Will resend once I figure out what's
> > going on
> 
> Well, I think there are actually multiple issues on multiple
> machines. This fixes the issue on ThinkPad X1 Titanium Gen1 [1].
> 
> I suspect reverting 98e497e203a5 ("drm/i915/dpcd_bl: uncheck PWM_PIN_CAP
> when detect eDP backlight capabilities") would too. But then that would
> break *other* machines that claim support for *both* eDP PWM pin and
> DPCD backlight control, I think.
> 
> I think there are issues with how we try setup DPCD backlight if the GOP
> has set up PWM backlight. For example, we don't set the backlight
> control mode correctly until the next disable/enable sequence. However,
> I tried to fix this, and I think I was doing all the right things, and
> DPCD reads seemed to confirm this, yet I was not able to control
> brightness using DPCD. I don't know what gives, but I do know eDP PWM
> pin control works.

Should we go ahead and push the VESA fix for this then? If you're willing to
test future patches on that machine, we could give another shot at enabling this
in the future if we find reason to.

> 
> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 
> [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3158
> 
> 
> > 
> > On Thu, 2021-03-18 at 13:02 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > > Looks like that there actually are another subset of laptops on the market
> > > that don't support the Intel HDR backlight interface, but do advertise
> > > support for the VESA DPCD backlight interface despite the fact it doesn't
> > > seem to work.
> > > 
> > > Note though I'm not entirely clear on this - on one of the machines where
> > > this issue was observed, I also noticed that we appeared to be rejecting
> > > the VBT defined backlight frequency in
> > > intel_dp_aux_vesa_calc_max_backlight(). It's noted in this function that:
> > > 
> > > /* Use highest possible value of Pn for more granularity of brightness
> > >  * adjustment while satifying the conditions below.
> > >  * ...
> > >  * - FxP is within 25% of desired value.
> > >  *   Note: 25% is arbitrary value and may need some tweak.
> > >  */
> > > 
> > > So it's possible that this value might just need to be tweaked, but for
> > > now
> > > let's just disable the VESA backlight interface unless it's specified in
> > > the VBT just to be safe. We might be able to try enabling this again by
> > > default in the future.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 2227816e647a ("drm/i915/dp: Allow forcing specific interfaces
> > > through
> > > enable_dpcd_backlight")
> > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> > > Bugzilla: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3169
> > > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c | 1 -
> > >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> > > index 651884390137..4f8337c7fd2e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> > > @@ -646,7 +646,6 @@ int intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs(struct
> > > intel_connector *connector)
> > >                         break;
> > >                 case INTEL_BACKLIGHT_DISPLAY_DDI:
> > >                         try_intel_interface = true;
> > > -                       try_vesa_interface = true;
> > >                         break;
> > >                 default:
> > >                         return -ENODEV;
> 

-- 
Sincerely,
   Lyude Paul (she/her)
   Software Engineer at Red Hat
   
Note: I deal with a lot of emails and have a lot of bugs on my plate. If you've
asked me a question, are waiting for a review/merge on a patch, etc. and I
haven't responded in a while, please feel free to send me another email to check
on my status. I don't bite!