[Intel-gfx] Enabling sample_c optimization for Broadwell GPUs
Kenneth Graunke
kenneth at whitecape.org
Wed May 5 15:35:46 UTC 2021
Hello,
Yes, that bit only exists on Haswell. On Haswell, sample_c operations
were processed at 1 pixel/clock unless you set that bit, in which case
they get processed at 4 pixels/clock. The downside is that it breaks
some obscure media feature that apparently no one used.
Broadwell and later alway process sample_c operations at the fast speed,
and there is no bit to control it. I would say that downstream patch is
incorrect.
--Ken
On Tuesday, May 4, 2021 4:07:14 PM PDT André Almeida wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> While browsing an old downstream kernel, I found a patch[0] that enables
> sample_c optimizations at Broadwell GPUs. The message from the upstream
> commit that enables it for Haswell[1] (and presumably where the code
> at[0] was copied from) states that "[..] later platforms remove this
> bit, and apparently always enable the optimization".
>
> Could you confirm that Broadwell and following architectures enable this
> optimization by default (and thus, patch[0] is a no-op), or should I
> upstream it?
>
> Thanks,
> André
>
> [0]
> https://github.com/ValveSoftware/steamos_kernel/commit/198990f13e1d9429864c177d9441a6559771c5e2
>
> [1]
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=944115934436b1ff6cf773a9e9123858ea9ef3da
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20210505/5bce37ff/attachment.sig>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list