[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm: Only select I2C_ALGOBIT for drivers that actually need it

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Hello,

On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 08:26:19PM -0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: drm: Only select I2C_ALGOBIT for drivers that actually need it
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90163/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10082_full -> Patchwork_20125_full
> ====================================================
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_20125_full absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in Patchwork_20125_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_20125_full:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>   * igt at gem_exec_gttfill@all:
>     - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][1]
>    [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20125/shard-apl6/igt@gem_exec_gttfill@all.html
> 
>   * igt at gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-basic-small-copy-xy:
>     - shard-snb:          NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][2]
>    [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20125/shard-snb2/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-basic-small-copy-xy.html
> 
>   * igt at kms_draw_crc@draw-method-xrgb8888-blt-untiled:
>     - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][3]
>    [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20125/shard-skl7/igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-xrgb8888-blt-untiled.html
> 
>   * igt at kms_plane_cursor@pipe-a-overlay-size-256:
>     - shard-snb:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][4] +1 similar issue
>    [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20125/shard-snb2/igt@kms_plane_cursor@pipe-a-overlay-size-256.html

I have problems understanding this mail, but I assume that my patch is
not the problem here as these are all runtime errors if I'm not
mistaken. If my patch has a problem it should result in a build failure
instead. Am I missing something?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20210516/c7fdeb16/attachment.sig>