[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] Per client engine busyness

Daniel Stone daniel at fooishbar.org
Tue May 18 09:16:52 UTC 2021


Hi,

On Tue, 18 May 2021 at 10:09, Tvrtko Ursulin
<tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> I was just wondering if stat(2) and a chrdev major check would be a
> solid criteria to more efficiently (compared to parsing the text
> content) detect drm files while walking procfs.

Maybe I'm missing something, but is the per-PID walk actually a
measurable performance issue rather than just a bit unpleasant?

Cheers,
Daniel


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list