[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/dmc: Introduce DMC_FW_MAIN
Souza, Jose
jose.souza at intel.com
Mon May 24 21:58:48 UTC 2021
On Mon, 2021-05-24 at 12:30 -0700, Anusha Srivatsa wrote:
> This is a prep patch for Pipe DMC plugging.
>
> Add dmc_info struct in intel_dmc to have all common fields
> shared between all DMC's in the package.
> Add DMC_FW_MAIN(dmc_id 0) to refer to the blob.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 44 +++++++++++-------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.h | 20 ++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> index f9a0f194f9cf..16bfbca6c1ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ struct stepping_info {
>
> bool intel_dmc_has_payload(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> {
> - return i915->dmc.dmc_payload;
> + return i915->dmc.dmc_info[DMC_FW_MAIN].payload;
> }
>
> static const struct stepping_info skl_stepping_info[] = {
> @@ -316,7 +316,8 @@ static void gen9_set_dc_state_debugmask(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> */
> void intel_dmc_load_program(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> - u32 *payload = dev_priv->dmc.dmc_payload;
> + struct intel_dmc *dmc = &dev_priv->dmc;
> + struct dmc_fw_info *dmc_info = &dmc->dmc_info[DMC_FW_MAIN];
> u32 i, fw_size;
>
> if (!HAS_DMC(dev_priv)) {
> @@ -325,26 +326,26 @@ void intel_dmc_load_program(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> return;
> }
>
> - if (!intel_dmc_has_payload(dev_priv)) {
> + if (!dev_priv->dmc.dmc_info[DMC_FW_MAIN].payload) {
> drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
> "Tried to program CSR with empty payload\n");
> return;
> }
>
> - fw_size = dev_priv->dmc.dmc_fw_size;
> + fw_size = dmc_info->dmc_fw_size;
> assert_rpm_wakelock_held(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
>
> preempt_disable();
>
> for (i = 0; i < fw_size; i++)
> intel_uncore_write_fw(&dev_priv->uncore, DMC_PROGRAM(i),
> - payload[i]);
> + dmc_info->payload[i]);
>
> preempt_enable();
>
> - for (i = 0; i < dev_priv->dmc.mmio_count; i++) {
> - intel_de_write(dev_priv, dev_priv->dmc.mmioaddr[i],
> - dev_priv->dmc.mmiodata[i]);
> + for (i = 0; i < dmc_info->mmio_count; i++) {
> + intel_de_write(dev_priv, dmc_info->mmioaddr[i],
> + dmc_info->mmiodata[i]);
> }
>
> dev_priv->dmc.dc_state = 0;
> @@ -401,13 +402,14 @@ static u32 parse_dmc_fw_header(struct intel_dmc *dmc,
> size_t rem_size)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = container_of(dmc, typeof(*i915), dmc);
> + struct dmc_fw_info *dmc_info = &dmc->dmc_info[DMC_FW_MAIN];
> unsigned int header_len_bytes, dmc_header_size, payload_size, i;
> const u32 *mmioaddr, *mmiodata;
> u32 mmio_count, mmio_count_max;
> u8 *payload;
>
> - BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(dmc->mmioaddr) < DMC_V3_MAX_MMIO_COUNT ||
> - ARRAY_SIZE(dmc->mmioaddr) < DMC_V1_MAX_MMIO_COUNT);
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(dmc_info->mmioaddr) < DMC_V3_MAX_MMIO_COUNT ||
> + ARRAY_SIZE(dmc_info->mmioaddr) < DMC_V1_MAX_MMIO_COUNT);
>
> /*
> * Check if we can access common fields, we will checkc again below
> @@ -463,16 +465,10 @@ static u32 parse_dmc_fw_header(struct intel_dmc *dmc,
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < mmio_count; i++) {
> - if (mmioaddr[i] < DMC_MMIO_START_RANGE ||
> - mmioaddr[i] > DMC_MMIO_END_RANGE) {
> - drm_err(&i915->drm, "DMC firmware has wrong mmio address 0x%x\n",
> - mmioaddr[i]);
> - return 0;
> - }
Why the checks above were dropped?
> - dmc->mmioaddr[i] = _MMIO(mmioaddr[i]);
> - dmc->mmiodata[i] = mmiodata[i];
> + dmc_info->mmioaddr[i] = _MMIO(mmioaddr[i]);
> + dmc_info->mmiodata[i] = mmiodata[i];
> }
> - dmc->mmio_count = mmio_count;
> + dmc_info->mmio_count = mmio_count;
>
> rem_size -= header_len_bytes;
>
> @@ -485,16 +481,16 @@ static u32 parse_dmc_fw_header(struct intel_dmc *dmc,
> drm_err(&i915->drm, "DMC FW too big (%u bytes)\n", payload_size);
> return 0;
> }
> - dmc->dmc_fw_size = dmc_header->fw_size;
> + dmc_info->dmc_fw_size = dmc_header->fw_size;
Did not read the next patches but the if possible would be better to rename dmc_info to dmc_main_info or dmc_pipe_info when possible.
>
> - dmc->dmc_payload = kmalloc(payload_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!dmc->dmc_payload) {
> + dmc_info->payload = kmalloc(payload_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!dmc_info->payload) {
> drm_err(&i915->drm, "Memory allocation failed for dmc payload\n");
> return 0;
> }
>
> payload = (u8 *)(dmc_header) + header_len_bytes;
> - memcpy(dmc->dmc_payload, payload, payload_size);
> + memcpy(dmc_info->payload, payload, payload_size);
>
> return header_len_bytes + payload_size;
>
> @@ -829,5 +825,5 @@ void intel_dmc_ucode_fini(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> intel_dmc_ucode_suspend(dev_priv);
> drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, dev_priv->dmc.wakeref);
>
> - kfree(dev_priv->dmc.dmc_payload);
> + kfree(dev_priv->dmc.dmc_info[DMC_FW_MAIN].payload);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.h
> index 4c22f567b61b..b747cc9bf6a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.h
> @@ -16,17 +16,27 @@ struct drm_i915_private;
> #define DMC_VERSION_MAJOR(version) ((version) >> 16)
> #define DMC_VERSION_MINOR(version) ((version) & 0xffff)
>
> +enum {
> + DMC_FW_MAIN = 0,
> + DMC_FW_MAX
> +};
> +
> struct intel_dmc {
> struct work_struct work;
> const char *fw_path;
> u32 required_version;
> u32 max_fw_size; /* bytes */
> - u32 *dmc_payload;
> - u32 dmc_fw_size; /* dwords */
> u32 version;
> - u32 mmio_count;
> - i915_reg_t mmioaddr[20];
> - u32 mmiodata[20];
> + struct dmc_fw_info {
> + u32 mmio_count;
> + i915_reg_t mmioaddr[20];
> + u32 mmiodata[20];
> + u32 dmc_offset;
> + u32 start_mmioaddr;
dmc_offset and start_mmioaddr are added but not used here. I guess it will in the next patches so please add it only when used.
> + u32 dmc_fw_size; /*dwords */
> + u32 *payload;
> + } dmc_info[DMC_FW_MAX];
> +
> u32 dc_state;
> u32 target_dc_state;
> u32 allowed_dc_mask;
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list