[Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 12/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't repeat CTB layout calculations
Michal Wajdeczko
michal.wajdeczko at intel.com
Tue May 25 13:07:06 UTC 2021
On 25.05.2021 04:53, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 12:13:26PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
>> From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
>>
>> We can retrieve offsets to cmds buffers and descriptor from
>> actual pointers that we already keep locally.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
>> index dbece569fbe4..fbd6bd20f588 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
>> @@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ int intel_guc_ct_enable(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>> {
>> struct intel_guc *guc = ct_to_guc(ct);
>> u32 base, cmds;
>> + void *blob;
>> int err;
>> int i;
>>
>> @@ -251,15 +252,18 @@ int intel_guc_ct_enable(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>>
>> /* vma should be already allocated and map'ed */
>> GEM_BUG_ON(!ct->vma);
>> + GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(ct->vma->obj));
>
> This doesn't really have anything to do with this patch, but again this
> patch will be squashed into a large patch updating the GuC firmware, so
> I think this is fine.
again, no need to squash GuC patches up to 20/97
>
> With that:
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
>
>> base = intel_guc_ggtt_offset(guc, ct->vma);
>>
>> - /* (re)initialize descriptors
>> - * cmds buffers are in the second half of the blob page
>> - */
>> + /* blob should start with send descriptor */
>> + blob = __px_vaddr(ct->vma->obj);
>> + GEM_BUG_ON(blob != ct->ctbs[CTB_SEND].desc);
>> +
>> + /* (re)initialize descriptors */
>> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ct->ctbs); i++) {
>> GEM_BUG_ON((i != CTB_SEND) && (i != CTB_RECV));
>>
>> - cmds = base + PAGE_SIZE / 4 * i + PAGE_SIZE / 2;
>> + cmds = base + ptrdiff(ct->ctbs[i].cmds, blob);
>> CT_DEBUG(ct, "%d: cmds addr=%#x\n", i, cmds);
>>
>> guc_ct_buffer_reset(&ct->ctbs[i], cmds);
>> @@ -269,12 +273,12 @@ int intel_guc_ct_enable(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>> * Register both CT buffers starting with RECV buffer.
>> * Descriptors are in first half of the blob.
>> */
>> - err = ct_register_buffer(ct, base + PAGE_SIZE / 4 * CTB_RECV,
>> + err = ct_register_buffer(ct, base + ptrdiff(ct->ctbs[CTB_RECV].desc, blob),
>> INTEL_GUC_CT_BUFFER_TYPE_RECV);
>> if (unlikely(err))
>> goto err_out;
>>
>> - err = ct_register_buffer(ct, base + PAGE_SIZE / 4 * CTB_SEND,
>> + err = ct_register_buffer(ct, base + ptrdiff(ct->ctbs[CTB_SEND].desc, blob),
>> INTEL_GUC_CT_BUFFER_TYPE_SEND);
>> if (unlikely(err))
>> goto err_deregister;
>> --
>> 2.28.0
>>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list