[Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 12/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't repeat CTB layout calculations

Michal Wajdeczko michal.wajdeczko at intel.com
Tue May 25 13:07:06 UTC 2021



On 25.05.2021 04:53, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 12:13:26PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
>> From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
>>
>> We can retrieve offsets to cmds buffers and descriptor from
>> actual pointers that we already keep locally.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
>> index dbece569fbe4..fbd6bd20f588 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
>> @@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ int intel_guc_ct_enable(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>>  {
>>  	struct intel_guc *guc = ct_to_guc(ct);
>>  	u32 base, cmds;
>> +	void *blob;
>>  	int err;
>>  	int i;
>>  
>> @@ -251,15 +252,18 @@ int intel_guc_ct_enable(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>>  
>>  	/* vma should be already allocated and map'ed */
>>  	GEM_BUG_ON(!ct->vma);
>> +	GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(ct->vma->obj));
> 
> This doesn't really have anything to do with this patch, but again this
> patch will be squashed into a large patch updating the GuC firmware, so
> I think this is fine.

again, no need to squash GuC patches up to 20/97

> 
> With that:
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> 
>>  	base = intel_guc_ggtt_offset(guc, ct->vma);
>>  
>> -	/* (re)initialize descriptors
>> -	 * cmds buffers are in the second half of the blob page
>> -	 */
>> +	/* blob should start with send descriptor */
>> +	blob = __px_vaddr(ct->vma->obj);
>> +	GEM_BUG_ON(blob != ct->ctbs[CTB_SEND].desc);
>> +
>> +	/* (re)initialize descriptors */
>>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ct->ctbs); i++) {
>>  		GEM_BUG_ON((i != CTB_SEND) && (i != CTB_RECV));
>>  
>> -		cmds = base + PAGE_SIZE / 4 * i + PAGE_SIZE / 2;
>> +		cmds = base + ptrdiff(ct->ctbs[i].cmds, blob);
>>  		CT_DEBUG(ct, "%d: cmds addr=%#x\n", i, cmds);
>>  
>>  		guc_ct_buffer_reset(&ct->ctbs[i], cmds);
>> @@ -269,12 +273,12 @@ int intel_guc_ct_enable(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>>  	 * Register both CT buffers starting with RECV buffer.
>>  	 * Descriptors are in first half of the blob.
>>  	 */
>> -	err = ct_register_buffer(ct, base + PAGE_SIZE / 4 * CTB_RECV,
>> +	err = ct_register_buffer(ct, base + ptrdiff(ct->ctbs[CTB_RECV].desc, blob),
>>  				 INTEL_GUC_CT_BUFFER_TYPE_RECV);
>>  	if (unlikely(err))
>>  		goto err_out;
>>  
>> -	err = ct_register_buffer(ct, base + PAGE_SIZE / 4 * CTB_SEND,
>> +	err = ct_register_buffer(ct, base + ptrdiff(ct->ctbs[CTB_SEND].desc, blob),
>>  				 INTEL_GUC_CT_BUFFER_TYPE_SEND);
>>  	if (unlikely(err))
>>  		goto err_deregister;
>> -- 
>> 2.28.0
>>


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list