[Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 38/97] drm/i915/guc: Optimize CTB writes and reads

Matthew Brost matthew.brost at intel.com
Tue May 25 17:39:24 UTC 2021


On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 03:31:25PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> 
> 
> On 06.05.2021 21:13, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > CTB writes are now in the path of command submission and should be
> > optimized for performance. Rather than reading CTB descriptor values
> > (e.g. head, tail, size) which could result in accesses across the PCIe
> 
> size was removed from the descriptor in 25/97
> 

Yep, stale comment.

> > bus, store shadow local copies and only read/write the descriptor
> > values when absolutely necessary.
> 
> maybe worth to add some words about caching available space ?
> 

Yea.

> > 
> > Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 78 +++++++++++++----------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h |  6 ++
> >  2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> > index 4eab319d61be..77dfbc94dcc3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
> > @@ -127,6 +127,10 @@ static void guc_ct_buffer_desc_init(struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc)
> >  static void guc_ct_buffer_reset(struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb)
> >  {
> >  	ctb->broken = false;
> > +	ctb->tail = 0;
> > +	ctb->head = 0;
> > +	ctb->space = CIRC_SPACE(ctb->tail, ctb->head, ctb->size);
> > +
> >  	guc_ct_buffer_desc_init(ctb->desc);
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -371,10 +375,8 @@ static int ct_write(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> >  {
> >  	struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.send;
> >  	struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc = ctb->desc;
> > -	u32 head = desc->head;
> > -	u32 tail = desc->tail;
> > +	u32 tail = ctb->tail;
> >  	u32 size = ctb->size;
> > -	u32 used;
> >  	u32 header;
> >  	u32 hxg;
> >  	u32 *cmds = ctb->cmds;
> > @@ -386,25 +388,14 @@ static int ct_write(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> >  	if (unlikely(desc->status))
> >  		goto corrupted;
> >  
> > -	if (unlikely((tail | head) >= size)) {
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_GUC
> > +	if (unlikely((desc->tail | desc->head) >= size)) {
> >  		CT_ERROR(ct, "Invalid offsets head=%u tail=%u (size=%u)\n",
> > -			 head, tail, size);
> > +			 desc->head, desc->tail, size);
> >  		desc->status |= GUC_CTB_STATUS_OVERFLOW;
> >  		goto corrupted;
> 
> nit: as we are now caching tail value, we can start comparing it with
> the value in descriptor and report GUC_CTB_STATUS_MISMATCH if needed
>

Sure.
 
> >  	}
> > -
> > -	/*
> > -	 * tail == head condition indicates empty. GuC FW does not support
> > -	 * using up the entire buffer to get tail == head meaning full.
> > -	 */
> > -	if (tail < head)
> > -		used = (size - head) + tail;
> > -	else
> > -		used = tail - head;
> > -
> > -	/* make sure there is a space including extra dw for the fence */
> > -	if (unlikely(used + len + 1 >= size))
> > -		return -ENOSPC;
> > +#endif
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * dw0: CT header (including fence)
> > @@ -444,7 +435,9 @@ static int ct_write(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> >  	write_barrier(ct);
> >  
> >  	/* now update descriptor */
> > +	ctb->tail = tail;
> >  	WRITE_ONCE(desc->tail, tail);
> > +	ctb->space -= len + 1;
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> >  
> > @@ -460,7 +453,7 @@ static int ct_write(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> >   * @req:	pointer to pending request
> >   * @status:	placeholder for status
> >   *
> > - * For each sent request, Guc shall send bac CT response message.
> > + * For each sent request, GuC shall send back CT response message.
> >   * Our message handler will update status of tracked request once
> >   * response message with given fence is received. Wait here and
> >   * check for valid response status value.
> > @@ -508,24 +501,35 @@ static inline bool ct_deadlocked(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static inline bool ctb_has_room(struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb, u32 len_dw)
> > +static inline bool h2g_has_room(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, u32 len_dw)
> 
> this function was introduced moment ago ...
> can we minimize number of changes between patches ?
>

Yep.
 
> >  {
> > -	struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc = ctb->desc;
> > -	u32 head = READ_ONCE(desc->head);
> > +	struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.send;
> > +	u32 head;
> >  	u32 space;
> >  
> > -	space = CIRC_SPACE(desc->tail, head, ctb->size);
> > +	if (ctb->space >= len_dw)
> > +		return true;
> > +
> > +	head = READ_ONCE(ctb->desc->head);
> > +	if (unlikely(head > ctb->size)) {
> > +		CT_ERROR(ct, "Corrupted descriptor head=%u tail=%u size=%u\n",
> > +			  ctb->desc->head, ctb->desc->tail, ctb->size);
> > +		ctb->desc->status |= GUC_CTB_STATUS_OVERFLOW;
> > +		ctb->broken = true;
> > +		return false;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	space = CIRC_SPACE(ctb->tail, head, ctb->size);
> > +	ctb->space = space;
> 
> shouldn't we update our ctb->head with new head value?
>

Don't need it here as the cached H2G head value isn't used by the i915,
only the space value is. The G2H head value is used.
 
> >  
> >  	return space >= len_dw;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int has_room_nb(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, u32 len_dw)
> >  {
> > -	struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.send;
> > -
> >  	lockdep_assert_held(&ct->ctbs.send.lock);
> >  
> > -	if (unlikely(!ctb_has_room(ctb, len_dw))) {
> > +	if (unlikely(!h2g_has_room(ct, len_dw))) {
> >  		if (ct->stall_time == KTIME_MAX)
> >  			ct->stall_time = ktime_get();
> >  
> > @@ -593,11 +597,11 @@ static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> >  	 * rare.
> >  	 */
> >  retry:
> > -	spin_lock_irqsave(&ct->ctbs.send.lock, flags);
> > -	if (unlikely(!ctb_has_room(ctb, len + 1))) {
> > +	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctb->lock, flags);
> > +	if (unlikely(!h2g_has_room(ct, len + 1))) {
> >  		if (ct->stall_time == KTIME_MAX)
> >  			ct->stall_time = ktime_get();
> > -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ct->ctbs.send.lock, flags);
> > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctb->lock, flags);
> 
> this ...
> 
> >  
> >  		if (unlikely(ct_deadlocked(ct)))
> >  			return -EDEADLK;
> > @@ -620,7 +624,7 @@ static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
> >  
> >  	err = ct_write(ct, action, len, fence, 0);
> >  
> > -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ct->ctbs.send.lock, flags);
> > +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctb->lock, flags);
> 
> and this likely could be done in earlier patch
> 

Probably.

> >  
> >  	if (unlikely(err))
> >  		goto unlink;
> > @@ -708,7 +712,7 @@ static int ct_read(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg **msg)
> >  {
> >  	struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.recv;
> >  	struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc = ctb->desc;
> > -	u32 head = desc->head;
> > +	u32 head = ctb->head;
> >  	u32 tail = desc->tail;
> >  	u32 size = ctb->size;
> >  	u32 *cmds = ctb->cmds;
> > @@ -723,12 +727,21 @@ static int ct_read(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg **msg)
> >  	if (unlikely(desc->status))
> >  		goto corrupted;
> >  
> > -	if (unlikely((tail | head) >= size)) {
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_GUC
> > +	if (unlikely((desc->tail | desc->head) >= size)) {
> >  		CT_ERROR(ct, "Invalid offsets head=%u tail=%u (size=%u)\n",
> >  			 head, tail, size);
> >  		desc->status |= GUC_CTB_STATUS_OVERFLOW;
> >  		goto corrupted;
> >  	}
> > +#else
> > +	if (unlikely((tail | ctb->head) >= size)) {
> 
> we are in control of cached 'ctb->head' so it shall never be > size
> 
> > +		CT_ERROR(ct, "Invalid offsets head=%u tail=%u (size=%u)\n",
> > +			 head, tail, size);
> > +		desc->status |= GUC_CTB_STATUS_OVERFLOW;
> > +		goto corrupted;
> > +	}
> > +#endif
> >  
> >  	/* tail == head condition indicates empty */
> >  	available = tail - head;
> > @@ -778,6 +791,7 @@ static int ct_read(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg **msg)
> >  	}
> >  	CT_DEBUG(ct, "received %*ph\n", 4 * len, (*msg)->msg);
> >  
> > +	ctb->head = head;
> >  	/* now update descriptor */
> >  	WRITE_ONCE(desc->head, head);
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> > index 55ef7c52472f..9924335e2ee6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
> > @@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ struct intel_guc;
> >   * @desc: pointer to the buffer descriptor
> >   * @cmds: pointer to the commands buffer
> >   * @size: size of the commands buffer in dwords
> > + * @head: local shadow copy of head in dwords
> > + * @tail: local shadow copy of tail in dwords
> > + * @space: local shadow copy of space in dwords
> >   * @broken: flag to indicate if descriptor data is broken
> >   */
> >  struct intel_guc_ct_buffer {
> > @@ -40,6 +43,9 @@ struct intel_guc_ct_buffer {
> >  	struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc;
> >  	u32 *cmds;
> >  	u32 size;
> > +	u32 tail;
> > +	u32 head;
> > +	u32 space;
> >  	bool broken;
> >  };
> >  
> > 


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list