[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Clean a few backend interfaces in the i915

[Daniel Vetter]

On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 08:54:38AM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 04:27:49PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > 
> > On 25/05/2021 14:56, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 11:32:12AM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > > > As discussed in [1] start merging some support patches as a precursor to
> > > > GuC submission the i915. This is step #1 mentioned in [1].
> > > > 
> > > > [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/89844/
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Pushed to drm-intel-gt-next, thanks for patches&reviews. Btw you can also
> > > ping John H or Daniele for pushing stuff for you, should be quicker than
> > > waiting for me to return from a lon w/e :-)
> > > 
> > > Plus I _really_ don't want to get back into the business of pushing other
> > > people's work ...
> > 
> > To Matt - Also please take care to preserve r-b's when resurrecting patches
> > because all of these three had mine from before which is now lost in git
> > history.
> >
> 
> Will do. Still getting used to the upstream rules and wasn't sure if
> should have included your old R-Bs.

If you have an r-b but for an old version with some significant changes
compared to the current one add a (v1) or similar tag at the end of that
r-b. That way it's not lost, but also not misattributed to a newer and
potentially buggy version of the patch.
-Daniel

> 
> Matt
>  
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Tvrtko

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch