[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/ttm: Async migration (rev11)

[Thomas Hellström]

On Wed, 2021-11-24 at 11:56 +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> 
> On 11/24/21 10:42, Patchwork wrote:
> 
> > Project List - Patchwork Patch Details Series: drm/i915/ttm: Async
> > migration (rev11) URL:
> > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/96798/ State: failure
> > Details:
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21672/index.html
> > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10921_full -> Patchwork_21672_fullSummaryFAILURE
> > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_21672_full absolutely
> > need to be
> > verified manually.
> > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the
> > changes
> > introduced in Patchwork_21672_full, please notify your bug team to
> > allow them
> > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false
> > positives in CI.
> > Participating hosts (11 -> 11)No changes in participating hosts
> > Possible new issuesHere are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> > Patchwork_21672_full:
> > IGT changesPossible regressions * igt at gem_exec_capture@pi at rcs0: shard-skl: PASS -> INCOMPLETE
> >  * igt at gem_exec_create@forked at smem: shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> INCOMPLETE
> >  * igt at kms_atomic_interruptible@universal-setplane-cursor at dp-1-pipe-a:
> >    shard-kbl: PASS -> INCOMPLETE +2 similar issues
> Lakshmi,
> These failures are unrelated. The first one appears also elsewhere,
> The other two appears to be a general problem with shard-kbl. Lots of
> random hangs from that one.
> /Thomas
> 
Lakshmi, Those shard-kbl failures appear to be machine related. (Not
the first skl failure, though), so no need to file issues for the two
last ones. I'll trigger a rerun.

/Thomas

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20211124/19763340/attachment.htm>