[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/16] drm/i915: Call i915_gem_evict_vm in vm_fault_gtt to prevent new ENOSPC errors

Maarten Lankhorst maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com
Mon Nov 29 13:47:30 UTC 2021


Now that we cannot unbind kill the currently locked object directly
because we're removing short term pinning, we may have to unbind the
object from gtt manually, using a i915_gem_evict_vm() call.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
index 65fc6ff5f59d..6d557bb9926f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
@@ -357,8 +357,22 @@ static vm_fault_t vm_fault_gtt(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 			vma = i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww(obj, &ww, &view, 0, 0, flags);
 		}
 
-		/* The entire mappable GGTT is pinned? Unexpected! */
-		GEM_BUG_ON(vma == ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC));
+		/*
+		 * The entire mappable GGTT is pinned? Unexpected!
+		 * Try to evict the object we locked too, as normally we skip it
+		 * due to lack of short term pinning inside execbuf.
+		 */
+		if (vma == ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC)) {
+			ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&ggtt->vm.mutex);
+			if (!ret) {
+				ret = i915_gem_evict_vm(&ggtt->vm, &ww);
+				mutex_unlock(&ggtt->vm.mutex);
+			}
+			if (ret)
+				goto err_reset;
+			vma = i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww(obj, &ww, &view, 0, 0, flags);
+		}
+		GEM_WARN_ON(vma == ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC));
 	}
 	if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
 		ret = PTR_ERR(vma);
-- 
2.34.0



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list