[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/16] drm/i915: Ensure i915_vma tests do not get -ENOSPC with the locking changes.

[Maarten Lankhorst]

Now that we require locking to evict, multiple vmas from the same object
might not be evicted. This is expected and required, because execbuf will
move to short-term pinning by using the lock only. This will cause these
tests to fail, because they create a ton of vma's for the same object.

Unbind manually to prevent spurious -ENOSPC in those mock tests.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c
index 1f10fe36619b..5c5809dfe9b2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c
@@ -691,7 +691,11 @@ static int igt_vma_rotate_remap(void *arg)
 					}
 
 					i915_vma_unpin(vma);
-
+					err = i915_vma_unbind(vma);
+					if (err) {
+						pr_err("Unbinding returned %i\n", err);
+						goto out_object;
+					}
 					cond_resched();
 				}
 			}
@@ -848,6 +852,11 @@ static int igt_vma_partial(void *arg)
 
 				i915_vma_unpin(vma);
 				nvma++;
+				err = i915_vma_unbind(vma);
+				if (err) {
+					pr_err("Unbinding returned %i\n", err);
+					goto out_object;
+				}
 
 				cond_resched();
 			}
@@ -882,6 +891,12 @@ static int igt_vma_partial(void *arg)
 
 		i915_vma_unpin(vma);
 
+		err = i915_vma_unbind(vma);
+		if (err) {
+			pr_err("Unbinding returned %i\n", err);
+			goto out_object;
+		}
+
 		count = 0;
 		list_for_each_entry(vma, &obj->vma.list, obj_link)
 			count++;
-- 
2.34.0