[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/24] drm/i915/uncore: split the fw get function into separate vfunc
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at intel.com
Mon Oct 4 07:45:49 UTC 2021
On Mon, 04 Oct 2021, "Saarinen, Jani" <jani.saarinen at intel.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Dave Airlie
>> Sent: maanantai 4. lokakuuta 2021 3.33
>> To: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula at intel.com>; Intel Graphics Development <intel-
>> gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>; Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>; Sarvela, Tomi P
>> <tomi.p.sarvela at intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/24] drm/i915/uncore: split the fw get function
>> into separate vfunc
>>
>> On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 at 05:27, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 01:57:45AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> > > From: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
>> > >
>> > > constify it while here. drop the put function since it was never
>> > > overloaded and always has done the same thing, no point in
>> > > indirecting it for show.
>> > >
>> > > Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>> > > Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
>> > > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>> >
>> > This has totally broken snb and ivb machines. Total death ensues
>> > somewhere in uncore init after some backtraces fly by.
>> > Didn't get any logs out to disk unfortunately. Please revert.
>> >
>> > Sadly CI is still afraid to report when machines disappear.
>> > For the bat report you at least get a list of machines that were awol,
>> > but the shard run seems to not even mention that all snbs suddenly
>> > vanished.
>> >
>> > I've said it before and I'll say it again. We really should
>> > *not* be loading i915 when the machine boots. That way we'd at least
>> > get the machine up and running and can report that loading i915 is the
>> > thing that killed it...
>>
>> That is frustrating, I've sent a oneline fix that should fix it up.
>> hopefully CI will pick it up.
> It seems it did (this for ivb, snb only):
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21231/index.html?hosts=snb%7Civb
Pushed now.
BR,
Jani.
>
>>
>> Dave.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list