[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/28] drm: use new iterator in drm_gem_fence_array_add_implicit v3

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 01/10/2021 11:06, Christian König wrote:
> Simplifying the code a bit.
> 
> v2: add missing rcu_read_lock()/unlock()
> v3: switch to locked version
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 26 +++++---------------------
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> index 09c820045859..4dcdec6487bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> @@ -1340,31 +1340,15 @@ int drm_gem_fence_array_add_implicit(struct xarray *fence_array,
>   				     struct drm_gem_object *obj,
>   				     bool write)
>   {
> -	int ret;
> -	struct dma_fence **fences;
> -	unsigned int i, fence_count;
> -
> -	if (!write) {
> -		struct dma_fence *fence =
> -			dma_resv_get_excl_unlocked(obj->resv);
> -
> -		return drm_gem_fence_array_add(fence_array, fence);
> -	}
> +	struct dma_resv_iter cursor;
> +	struct dma_fence *fence;
> +	int ret = 0;
>   
> -	ret = dma_resv_get_fences(obj->resv, NULL,
> -						&fence_count, &fences);
> -	if (ret || !fence_count)
> -		return ret;
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < fence_count; i++) {
> -		ret = drm_gem_fence_array_add(fence_array, fences[i]);
> +	dma_resv_for_each_fence(&cursor, obj->resv, write, fence) {
> +		ret = drm_gem_fence_array_add(fence_array, fence);
>   		if (ret)
>   			break;
>   	}
> -
> -	for (; i < fence_count; i++)
> -		dma_fence_put(fences[i]);
> -	kfree(fences);
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_fence_array_add_implicit);
> 

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>

Regards,

Tvrtko