[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [v7,1/8] drm/i915/gem: Break out some shmem backend utils
Christian König
ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com
Thu Oct 7 09:19:15 UTC 2021
Am 07.10.21 um 11:15 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/10/2021 16:26, Patchwork wrote:
>> *Patch Details*
>> *Series:* series starting with [v7,1/8] drm/i915/gem: Break out
>> some shmem backend utils
>> *URL:* https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/95501/
>> <https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/95501/>
>> *State:* failure
>> *Details:*
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21264/index.html
>> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21264/index.html>
>>
>>
>> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10688_full -> Patchwork_21264_full
>>
>>
>> Summary
>>
>> *FAILURE*
>>
>> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_21264_full absolutely
>> need to be
>> verified manually.
>>
>> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>> introduced in Patchwork_21264_full, please notify your bug team to
>> allow them
>> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives
>> in CI.
>>
>>
>> Possible new issues
>>
>> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
>> Patchwork_21264_full:
>>
>>
>> IGT changes
>>
>>
>> Possible regressions
>>
>> *
>>
>> igt at gem_sync@basic-many-each:
>>
>> o shard-apl: NOTRUN -> INCOMPLETE
>> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21264/shard-apl7/igt@gem_sync@basic-many-each.html>
> Something still fishy in the unlocked iterator? Or dma_resv_get_fences
> using it?
Probably the later. I'm going to take a look.
Thanks for the notice,
Christian.
>
> <6> [187.551235] [IGT] gem_sync: starting subtest basic-many-each
> <1> [188.935462] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address:
> 0000000000000010
> <1> [188.935485] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
> <1> [188.935495] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
> <6> [188.935504] PGD 0 P4D 0
> <4> [188.935512] Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
> <4> [188.935521] CPU: 2 PID: 1467 Comm: gem_sync Not tainted
> 5.15.0-rc4-CI-Patchwork_21264+ #1
> <4> [188.935535] Hardware name: /NUC6CAYB, BIOS
> AYAPLCEL.86A.0049.2018.0508.1356 05/08/2018
> <4> [188.935546] RIP: 0010:dma_resv_get_fences+0x116/0x2d0
> <4> [188.935560] Code: 10 85 c0 7f c9 be 03 00 00 00 e8 15 8b df ff eb
> bd e8 8e c6 ff ff eb b6 41 8b 04 24 49 8b 55 00 48 89 e7 8d 48 01 41
> 89 0c 24 <4c> 89 34 c2 e8 41 f2 ff ff 49 89 c6 48 85 c0 75 8c 48 8b 44
> 24 10
> <4> [188.935583] RSP: 0018:ffffc900011dbcc8 EFLAGS: 00010202
> <4> [188.935593] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX:
> 0000000000000001
> <4> [188.935603] RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: ffffffff822e343c RDI:
> ffffc900011dbcc8
> <4> [188.935613] RBP: ffffc900011dbd48 R08: ffff88812d255bb8 R09:
> 00000000fffffffe
> <4> [188.935623] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12:
> ffffc900011dbd44
> <4> [188.935633] R13: ffffc900011dbd50 R14: ffff888113d29cc0 R15:
> 0000000000000000
> <4> [188.935643] FS: 00007f68d17e9700(0000) GS:ffff888277900000(0000)
> knlGS:0000000000000000
> <4> [188.935655] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> <4> [188.935665] CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 000000012d0a4000 CR4:
> 00000000003506e0
> <4> [188.935676] Call Trace:
> <4> [188.935685] i915_gem_object_wait+0x1ff/0x410 [i915]
> <4> [188.935988] i915_gem_wait_ioctl+0xf2/0x2a0 [i915]
> <4> [188.936272] ? i915_gem_object_wait+0x410/0x410 [i915]
> <4> [188.936533] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xae/0x140
> <4> [188.936546] drm_ioctl+0x201/0x3d0
> <4> [188.936555] ? i915_gem_object_wait+0x410/0x410 [i915]
> <4> [188.936820] ? __fget_files+0xc2/0x1c0
> <4> [188.936830] ? __fget_files+0xda/0x1c0
> <4> [188.936839] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6d/0xa0
> <4> [188.936848] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0xb0
> <4> [188.936859] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list