[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/28] drm/amdgpu: use new iterator in amdgpu_ttm_bo_eviction_valuable
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Wed Oct 13 14:07:45 UTC 2021
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 01:37:26PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Simplifying the code a bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 14 ++++----------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> index e8d70b6e6737..722e3c9e8882 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> @@ -1345,10 +1345,9 @@ static bool amdgpu_ttm_bo_eviction_valuable(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> const struct ttm_place *place)
> {
> unsigned long num_pages = bo->resource->num_pages;
> + struct dma_resv_iter resv_cursor;
> struct amdgpu_res_cursor cursor;
> - struct dma_resv_list *flist;
> struct dma_fence *f;
> - int i;
>
> /* Swapout? */
> if (bo->resource->mem_type == TTM_PL_SYSTEM)
> @@ -1362,14 +1361,9 @@ static bool amdgpu_ttm_bo_eviction_valuable(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> * If true, then return false as any KFD process needs all its BOs to
> * be resident to run successfully
> */
> - flist = dma_resv_shared_list(bo->base.resv);
> - if (flist) {
> - for (i = 0; i < flist->shared_count; ++i) {
> - f = rcu_dereference_protected(flist->shared[i],
> - dma_resv_held(bo->base.resv));
> - if (amdkfd_fence_check_mm(f, current->mm))
> - return false;
> - }
> + dma_resv_for_each_fence(&resv_cursor, bo->base.resv, true, f) {
^false?
At least I'm not seeing the code look at the exclusive fence here.
-Daniel
> + if (amdkfd_fence_check_mm(f, current->mm))
> + return false;
> }
>
> switch (bo->resource->mem_type) {
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list