[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Remove check for low voltage sku for max dp source rate
Imre Deak
imre.deak at intel.com
Thu Oct 14 12:52:10 UTC 2021
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 05:02:46PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
>
> On 10/13/2021 8:49 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 01:19:25PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
> > > On 10/5/2021 9:01 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 01:34:21PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > > > Cc: Imre, I think you were involved in adding the checks.
> > > > About ADL-S the spec says:
> > > >
> > > > Bspec 53597:
> > > > Combo Port Maximum Speed:
> > > > OEM must use VBT to specify a maximum that is tolerated by the board design.
> > > >
> > > > Combo Port HBR3 support:
> > > > May require retimer on motherboard. The OEM must use VBT to limit the link rate to HBR2 if HBR3 not supported by motherboard.
> > > >
> > > > Bspec/49201:
> > > > Combo Port HBR3/6.48GHz support:
> > > > Only supported on SKUs with higher I/O voltage
> > > >
> > > > I take the above meaning that only high voltage SKUs support HBR3 and
> > > > on those SKUs the OEM must limit this to HBR2 if HBR3 would require a
> > > > retimer on the board, but the board doesn't have this.
> > > >
> > > > If the above isn't correct and low voltage SKUs also in fact support
> > > > HBR3 (with retimers if necessary) then this should imo clarified at
> > > > Bspec/49201. The VBT limit could be used then if present, ignoring the
> > > > low voltage SKU readout.
> > > Thanks Imre for the inputs.
> > >
> > > As you have mentioned note : rate >5.4 G supported only on High voltage I/O,
> > > is mentioned for platforms like ICL, JSL and Display 12 platforms.
> > >
> > > I had again asked the HW team and VBT/GOP team whether we can safely rely on
> > > VBT for the max rate for these platforms, without worrying about the SKU's
> > > IO Voltage, and also requested them to update the Bspec page for the same.
> > >
> > > In response the Bspec pages 49201, 20598 are now updated with the note "OEM
> > > must use VBT to specify a maximum that is tolerated by the board design" for
> > > the rates above 5.4G.
> > Ok, thanks for this, now the spec is closer to the proposed changes. On
> > some platforms it's still unclear if the default max rate in the lack of
> > a VBT limit is HBR2 or HBR3. The ADL-S overview at Bspec/53597 is clear
> > now wrt. this:
> >
> > (*) "May require retimer on motherboard. The OEM must use VBT to limit the link rate
> > to HBR2 if HBR3 not supported by motherboard."
> >
> > ideally it should still clarify if the potential retimer requirement applies to
> > both eDP and DP or only to DP.
>
> Thanks Imre, point noted.
>
> I realized: in general, the Platform Overview page and Platform Combo phy
> clocks pages seem to be not in sync on the combo phy rate in some places.
>
> Earlier I was looking only on the clock pages for the combo phy rate
> information.
Yes, it's a bit scattered. Please also cross check the third place at
least for each affected platforms (ICL+) which is the Combo vswing
programming (Digital Display Interface/Combo PHY DDI Buffer etc.).
> I will again clarify this with the H/W team and request for the below
> suggested modifications for the given platforms.
Thanks.
> > I still see the followings to adjust in the spec so that it reflects
> > the patch:
> > - ICL
> > - bspec/20584:
> > "Increased IO voltage may be required to support HBR3 for the highest DisplayPort
> > and eDP resolutions."
> >
> > should be changed to (*) above mentioning that HBR3 is only supported on
> > eDP.
> >
> > - bspec/20598:
> > "Combo HBR3: OEM must use VBT to specify a miximum that is tolerated by the
> > board design."
> >
> > The DP/HBR3 support on ICL should be removed.
> >
> > For eDP/HBR3 on ICL the above comment should be changed to (*).
> >
> > - JSL
> > - bspec/32247:
> > "Increased IO voltage may be required to support HBR3 for the highest DisplayPort
> > resolutions."
> >
> > should be removed/changed to (*).
> >
> > - bspec/20598:
> > "OEM must use VBT to specify a miximum that is tolerated by the
> > board design."
> >
> > should be changed to (*).
> >
> > - TGL:
> > - bspec/49201:
> > "Combo HBR3: OEM must use VBT to specify a miximum that is tolerated
> > by the board design."
> >
> > The DP/HBR3 support should be removed, for eDP/HBR3 the above should
> > be changed to (*).
> >
> > - RKL:
> > - bspec/49201, 49204:
> > Remove the RKL tag, since there is a separate page for RKL.
> >
> > - bspec/49202:
> > "Combo HBR3: Only supported on SKUs with higher I/O voltage"
> >
> > should be changed to (*).
> >
> > - ADLS:
> > - bspec/49201, 49204:
> > The ADLS tag should be removed, since there is a separate page for ADLS.
> >
> > - bspec/53720:
> > "Combo HBR3: OEM must use VBT to specify a miximum that is tolerated by the
> > board design."
> >
> > should be changed to (*).
> >
> > - DG1:
> > - bspec/49205:
> > "Combo HBR3: Only supported on SKUs with higher I/O voltage"
> >
> > should be changed to (*) above.
> >
> > - DG2:
> > - bspec/53657:
> > For Combo HBR3 (*) should be added.
> >
> > - bspec/54034:
> > For Combo HBR3 (*) should be added.
> >
> > - ADLP:
> > - bspec/49185:
> > "Combo DP/HBR3: OEM must use VBT to specify a miximum that is tolerated by
> > the board design. An external re-timer may be needed."
> >
> > should be changed to (*).
> >
> >
> > Also could you add a debug print with the voltage configuration of combo
> > PHYs somewhere in intel_combo_phy.c?
>
> Yes, I can do that. I can add a debug print in icl_set_procmon_ref_values(
> ), where we are already reading the required register.
Ok. It could be already icl_verify_procmon_ref_values(), so we print
them even when skipping the PHY init step.
> This gets called during combo_phy_init and combo_phy_verify phase, so we
> should be able to get this info for each combo PHY port.
>
> Or otherwise, I can just print all combo phys voltage config together, once
> all are initialized.
>
> Thanks again for the detailed explanation.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ankit
>
> >
> > > From what I understand, we can depend upon the VBT's rate, and if there are
> > > some low voltage I/O SKUs that do not support HBR3 rate, it should be
> > > limited by the VBT.
> > >
> > > Thanks & Regards,
> > >
> > > Ankit
> > >
> > > > > BR,
> > > > > Jani.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 05 Oct 2021, "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On 10/5/2021 1:34 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tue, 05 Oct 2021, Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > The low voltage sku check can be ignored as OEMs need to consider that
> > > > > > > > when designing the board and then put any limits in VBT.
> > > > > > > "can" or "must"?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > VBT has been notoriously buggy over the years, and we need to safeguard
> > > > > > > against that. Are there any cases where having these checks are wrong?
> > > > > > Hi Jani,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bspec page for Combo PHY PLL frequencies now says "OEM must use VBT to
> > > > > > specify a maximum that is tolerated by the board design" for the rates
> > > > > > above 5.4G.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Earlier it was mentioned that rates > 5.4G were supported on SKUs with
> > > > > > Higher I/O Voltage.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There was an instance where on an ADL-S board, where VBT was showing as
> > > > > > HBR3 supporting for a combo phy port, but we were reading the IO
> > > > > > voltage as 0.85V in is_low_voltage_sku()
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (Specifically, we were reading Register_PORT_COMP_DW3 bits 24-25 as 0)
> > > > > > for a combo PHY port, and therefore we were limiting the BW to 5.4Gbps
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Due to this, 8k at 60 mode was getting pruned on the board for that combo
> > > > > > phy port. On removing the low_voltage_sku( ) the mode was able to be set
> > > > > > properly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Incidentally, with Windows 8k at 60 was also coming up on the same board on
> > > > > > same port.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So I had checked with HW team and GOP/VBT team if driver should consider
> > > > > > the low voltage sku check. As per their response we 'can' ignore the
> > > > > > check and rely on the VBT, as OEM should limit the rate as per board
> > > > > > design. The Bspec was also updated to reflect the same.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So IMHO we need not limit the rate as per is_low_voltage_sku check, as
> > > > > > this limiting of the rate through VBT is a must for the OEMs.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I should perhaps change the wording of the commit message to convey the
> > > > > > same.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ankit
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > BR,
> > > > > > > Jani.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Same is now changed in Bspec (53720).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com>
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 32 +++----------------------
> > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > > > > > > index 74a657ae131a..75c364c3c88e 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > > > > > > @@ -297,23 +297,13 @@ static int dg2_max_source_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > > > > > > return intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) ? 810000 : 1350000;
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > -static bool is_low_voltage_sku(struct drm_i915_private *i915, enum phy phy)
> > > > > > > > -{
> > > > > > > > - u32 voltage;
> > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > - voltage = intel_de_read(i915, ICL_PORT_COMP_DW3(phy)) & VOLTAGE_INFO_MASK;
> > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > - return voltage == VOLTAGE_INFO_0_85V;
> > > > > > > > -}
> > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > static int icl_max_source_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> > > > > > > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
> > > > > > > > enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(dev_priv, dig_port->base.port);
> > > > > > > > - if (intel_phy_is_combo(dev_priv, phy) &&
> > > > > > > > - (is_low_voltage_sku(dev_priv, phy) || !intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)))
> > > > > > > > + if (intel_phy_is_combo(dev_priv, phy) && !intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
> > > > > > > > return 540000;
> > > > > > > > return 810000;
> > > > > > > > @@ -321,23 +311,7 @@ static int icl_max_source_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > > > > > > static int ehl_max_source_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > - struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> > > > > > > > - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
> > > > > > > > - enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(dev_priv, dig_port->base.port);
> > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > - if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) || is_low_voltage_sku(dev_priv, phy))
> > > > > > > > - return 540000;
> > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > - return 810000;
> > > > > > > > -}
> > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > -static int dg1_max_source_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > > > > > > -{
> > > > > > > > - struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> > > > > > > > - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
> > > > > > > > - enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(i915, dig_port->base.port);
> > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > - if (intel_phy_is_combo(i915, phy) && is_low_voltage_sku(i915, phy))
> > > > > > > > + if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
> > > > > > > > return 540000;
> > > > > > > > return 810000;
> > > > > > > > @@ -380,7 +354,7 @@ intel_dp_set_source_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > > > > > > max_rate = dg2_max_source_rate(intel_dp);
> > > > > > > > else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) || IS_ALDERLAKE_S(dev_priv) ||
> > > > > > > > IS_DG1(dev_priv) || IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv))
> > > > > > > > - max_rate = dg1_max_source_rate(intel_dp);
> > > > > > > > + max_rate = 810000;
> > > > > > > > else if (IS_JSL_EHL(dev_priv))
> > > > > > > > max_rate = ehl_max_source_rate(intel_dp);
> > > > > > > > else
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list