[Intel-gfx] [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 2/2] dma-buf: Fix dma_resv_test_signaled.
Christian König
ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com
Fri Oct 15 12:56:59 UTC 2021
Am 15.10.21 um 14:52 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
> Op 15-10-2021 om 14:07 schreef Christian König:
>> Am 15.10.21 um 13:57 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
>>> Commit 7fa828cb9265 ("dma-buf: use new iterator in dma_resv_test_signaled")
>>> accidentally forgot to test whether the dma-buf is actually signaled, breaking
>>> pretty much everything depending on it.
>> NAK, the dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked() returns only unsignaled fences. So the code is correct as it is.
> That seems like it might cause some unexpected behavior when that function is called with one of the fence locks held, if it calls dma_fence_signal().
>
> Could it be changed to only test the signaled bit, in which case this patch would still be useful?
That's exactly what I suggested as well, but Daniel was against that
because of concerns around barriers.
> Or at least add some lockdep annotations, that fence->lock might be taken. So any hangs would at least be easy to spot with lockdep.
That should be trivial doable.
Christian.
>
> ~Maarten
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linaro-mm-sig mailing list
> Linaro-mm-sig at lists.linaro.org
> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-mm-sig
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list