[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/13] gpu/drm: make drm_add_edid_modes() consistent when updating connector->display_info

[Claudio Suarez]

On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 09:35:08PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 08:42:14PM +0200, Claudio Suarez wrote:
> > According to the documentation, drm_add_edid_modes
> > "... Also fills out the &drm_display_info structure and ELD in @connector
> > with any information which can be derived from the edid."
> > 
> > drm_add_edid_modes accepts a struct edid *edid parameter which may have a
> > value or may be null. When it is not null, connector->display_info and
> > connector->eld are updated according to the edid. When edid=NULL, only
> > connector->eld is reset. Reset connector->display_info to be consistent
> > and accurate.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Claudio Suarez <cssk at net-c.es>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 11 +++++------
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> > index 6325877c5fd6..c643db17782c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> > @@ -5356,14 +5356,13 @@ int drm_add_edid_modes(struct drm_connector *connector, struct edid *edid)
> >  	int num_modes = 0;
> >  	u32 quirks;
> >  
> > -	if (edid == NULL) {
> > -		clear_eld(connector);
> > -		return 0;
> > -	}
> >  	if (!drm_edid_is_valid(edid)) {
> 
> OK, so drm_edid_is_valid() will happily accept NULL and considers
> it invalid. You may want to mention that explicitly in the commit
> message.

Thank you for your comments, I appreciate :)
I'm sending new mails with the new commit messages.

> > +		/* edid == NULL or invalid here */
> >  		clear_eld(connector);
> > -		drm_warn(connector->dev, "%s: EDID invalid.\n",
> > -			 connector->name);
> > +		drm_reset_display_info(connector);
> > +		if (edid)
> > +			drm_warn(connector->dev, "%s: EDID invalid.\n",
> > +				 connector->name);
> 
> Could you respin this to use the standard [CONNECTOR:%d:%s] form
> while at it? Or I guess a patch to mass convert the whole drm_edid.c
> might be another option.

Good point.
I like the idea of a new patch. I'll start working on it. I can change
this drm_warn here to avoid merge conflicts.

> Patch looks good.
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

Thanks!

BR
Claudio Suarez.