[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/13] drm: implement top-down allocation method
Arunpravin
Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam at amd.com
Tue Oct 19 22:54:02 UTC 2021
Implemented a function which walk through the order list,
compares the offset and returns the maximum offset block,
this method is unpredictable in obtaining the high range
address blocks which depends on allocation and deallocation.
for instance, if driver requests address at a low specific
range, allocator traverses from the root block and splits
the larger blocks until it reaches the specific block and
in the process of splitting, lower orders in the freelist
are occupied with low range address blocks and for the
subsequent TOPDOWN memory request we may return the low
range blocks.To overcome this issue, we may go with the
below approach.
The other approach, sorting each order list entries in
ascending order and compares the last entry of each
order list in the freelist and return the max block.
This creates sorting overhead on every drm_buddy_free()
request and split up of larger blocks for a single page
request.
Signed-off-by: Arunpravin <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam at amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
include/drm/drm_buddy.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
index 138e9f1a7340..42ce4f8f4e0e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
@@ -334,6 +334,27 @@ alloc_range(struct drm_buddy_mm *mm,
return ERR_PTR(err);
}
+static struct drm_buddy_block *
+get_maxblock(struct list_head *head)
+{
+ struct drm_buddy_block *max_block = NULL, *node;
+
+ max_block = list_first_entry_or_null(head,
+ struct drm_buddy_block,
+ link);
+
+ if (!max_block)
+ return NULL;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(node, head, link) {
+ if (drm_buddy_block_offset(node) >
+ drm_buddy_block_offset(max_block))
+ max_block = node;
+ }
+
+ return max_block;
+}
+
static struct drm_buddy_block *
alloc_from_freelist(struct drm_buddy_mm *mm,
unsigned int order,
@@ -344,13 +365,22 @@ alloc_from_freelist(struct drm_buddy_mm *mm,
int err;
for (i = order; i <= mm->max_order; ++i) {
- if (!list_empty(&mm->free_list[i])) {
- block = list_first_entry_or_null(&mm->free_list[i],
- struct drm_buddy_block,
- link);
+ if (flags & DRM_BUDDY_TOPDOWN_ALLOCATION) {
+ if (!list_empty(&mm->free_list[i])) {
+ block = get_maxblock(&mm->free_list[i]);
- if (block)
- break;
+ if (block)
+ break;
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (!list_empty(&mm->free_list[i])) {
+ block = list_first_entry_or_null(&mm->free_list[i],
+ struct drm_buddy_block,
+ link);
+
+ if (block)
+ break;
+ }
}
}
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_buddy.h b/include/drm/drm_buddy.h
index ebf03d151845..19c7e298613e 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_buddy.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_buddy.h
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
|| size__ > end__ - start__; \
})
+#define DRM_BUDDY_TOPDOWN_ALLOCATION (1 << 0)
#define DRM_BUDDY_RANGE_ALLOCATION (1 << 1)
struct drm_buddy_block {
--
2.25.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list