[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/adlp: Extend PSR2 support in transcoder B

[Jani Nikula]

On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, "Hogander, Jouni" <jouni.hogander at intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-10-26 at 15:33 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
>> PSR2 is supported in transcoder A and B on Alderlake-P.
>> 
>> BSpec: 49185
>> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola at intel.com>
>> Cc: Jouni Hogander <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
>
> LGTM
>
> Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander at intel.com>

Since INVALID_TRANSCODER is a thing, I'd actually prefer:

	trans == TRANSCODER_A || trans == TRANSCODER_B

It's not likely INVALID_TRANSCODER will ever end up here, but I tried to
look and it's actually not trivial to say this will never happen. I
prefer the defensive approach.

BR,
Jani.


>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
>> index d35db50ef967a..710b911b065b9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
>> @@ -588,7 +588,9 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr2(struct intel_dp
>> *intel_dp)
>>  static bool
>>  transcoder_has_psr2(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum
>> transcoder trans)
>>  {
>> -	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12)
>> +	if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv))
>> +		return trans <= TRANSCODER_B;
>> +	else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12)
>>  		return trans == TRANSCODER_A;
>>  	else
>>  		return trans == TRANSCODER_EDP;
>

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center