[Intel-gfx] [PATCH V5 0/5] drm/i915/gt: Initialize unused MOCS entries to L3_WB

Ramalingam C ramalingam.c at intel.com
Fri Sep 3 15:20:13 UTC 2021


Thanks Ayaz for the patches and all the review efforts. Merged the patches.

-Ram

On 2021-09-03 at 19:11:24 +0530, Kattamanchi, JaswanthX wrote:
> Hi Ayaz,
> 
> Re-reported
> 
> Patch : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/94315/
> 
> Regards,
> Jaswanth Kattamanchi
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Siddiqui, Ayaz A <ayaz.siddiqui at intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 3, 2021 6:29 PM
> To: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Vudum, Lakshminarayana <lakshminarayana.vudum at intel.com>; Illipilli, TejasreeX <tejasreex.illipilli at intel.com>; Kattamanchi, JaswanthX <jaswanthx.kattamanchi at intel.com>
> Cc: Szwichtenberg, Radoslaw <radoslaw.szwichtenberg at intel.com>; Meena, Mahesh <mahesh.meena at intel.com>; C, Ramalingam <ramalingam.c at intel.com>; De Marchi, Lucas <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>; Roper, Matthew D <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH V5 0/5] drm/i915/gt: Initialize unused MOCS entries to L3_WB
> 
> Hi,
>  I see a failure reported on IGT-CI for this series for SKL,
> 
>  igt at gem_ctx_isolation@preservation-s3 at rcs0:
> shard-skl: PASS -> DMESG-WARN
> 
> Changes set in this series are applicable for gen12 onward platforms except TGL/RKL.
> 
> So above failure look like a false alarm to me.
> 
> Regards
> -Ayaz
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Siddiqui, Ayaz A <ayaz.siddiqui at intel.com>
> > Sent: Friday, September 3, 2021 2:52 PM
> > To: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: Siddiqui, Ayaz A <ayaz.siddiqui at intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH V5 0/5] drm/i915/gt: Initialize unused MOCS entries to
> > L3_WB
> >
> > Gen >= 12 onwards MOCS table doesn't have a setting for PTE so
> > I915_MOCS_PTE is not a valid index and it will have different MOCS
> > values are based on the platform.
> >
> > To detect these kinds of misprogramming, all the unspecified and
> > reserved MOCS indexes are set to WB_L3. TGL/RKL unspecified MOCS
> > indexes are pointing to L3 UC are kept intact to avoid API break.
> >
> > This series also contains patches to program BLIT_CCTL and CMD_CCTL
> > registers to UC.
> > Since we are quite late to update MOCS table for TGL so added a new
> > MOCS table for ADL family.
> >
> > V2:
> >  1. Added CMD_CCTL to GUC regset list so that it can be restored
> >     after engine reset.
> >  2. Checkpatch warning removal.
> >
> > V3:
> >  1. Changed implementation to have a framework only.
> >  2. Added register type for proper application.
> >  3. moved CMD_CCTL programming to a separate patch.
> >  4. Added L3CC initialization during gt reset so that MOCS indexes are
> >     set before GuC initialization.
> >  5. Removed Renderer check for L3CC verification in selftest.
> >
> > V4:
> >  1. Moved register programming in Workaorund section as fake workaround.
> >  2. Removed seperate ADL mocs table, new logic is to set unused index as
> >     L3_WB for gen12 platform except TGL/RKL.
> >
> > V5:
> >  1. Final version reviewed by Matt Roper  2. Removed "drm/i915/selftest:
> > Remove Renderer class check for l3cc table read" form series,
> >     this patch will be taken care of in different series.
> >
> > Ayaz A Siddiqui (4):
> >   drm/i915/gt: Add support of mocs propagation
> >   drm/i915/gt: Set CMD_CCTL to UC for Gen12 Onward
> >   drm/i915/gt: Set BLIT_CCTL reg to un-cached
> >   drm/i915/gt: Initialize unused MOCS entries with device specific
> >     values
> >
> > Sreedhar Telukuntla (1):
> >   drm/i915/gt: Initialize L3CC table in mocs init
> >
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c          |  2 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h    |  4 ++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c        | 72 ++++++++++++++-------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.h        |  1 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 70
> > +++++++++++++++++++-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h             | 26 ++++++++
> >  6 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.26.2
> 


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list