[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 02/13] drm/dp: use more of the extended receiver cap

[Lyude Paul]

I thought I remembered an issue with this but looked up the previous emails,
and it looks like that this change actually should be safe!

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>

On Thu, 2021-09-09 at 15:51 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Extend the use of extended receiver cap at 0x2200 to cover
> MAIN_LINK_CHANNEL_CODING_CAP in 0x2206, in case an implementation hides
> the DP 2.0 128b/132b channel encoding cap.
> 
> v2: Extend to DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE (Ville)
> 
> Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
> Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> index 9b2a2961fca8..2e74b02ed96b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> @@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ static u8 drm_dp_downstream_port_count(const u8
> dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE])
>  static int drm_dp_read_extended_dpcd_caps(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
>                                           u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE])
>  {
> -       u8 dpcd_ext[6];
> +       u8 dpcd_ext[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE];
>         int ret;
>  
>         /*

-- 
Cheers,
 Lyude Paul (she/her)
 Software Engineer at Red Hat