[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 06/12] drm/ttm: add TTM_PAGE_FLAG_EXTERNAL_MAPPABLE
Matthew Auld
matthew.auld at intel.com
Thu Sep 16 09:58:38 UTC 2021
On 16/09/2021 10:03, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-09-16 at 08:55 +0200, Christian König wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 15.09.21 um 20:59 schrieb Matthew Auld:
>>> In commit:
>>>
>>> commit 667a50db0477d47fdff01c666f5ee1ce26b5264c
>>> Author: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom at vmware.com>
>>> Date: Fri Jan 3 11:17:18 2014 +0100
>>>
>>> drm/ttm: Refuse to fault (prime-) imported pages
>>>
>>> we introduced the restriction that imported pages should not be
>>> directly
>>> mappable through TTM(this also extends to userptr). In the next
>>> patch we
>>> want to introduce a shmem_tt backend, which should follow all the
>>> existing rules with TTM_PAGE_FLAG_EXTERNAL, since it will need to
>>> handle
>>> swapping itself, but with the above mapping restriction lifted.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
>>> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c | 6 ++++--
>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.h | 7 +++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
>>> index 708390588c7c..fd6e18f12f50 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
>>> @@ -163,8 +163,10 @@ vm_fault_t ttm_bo_vm_reserve(struct
>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>> * (if at all) by redirecting mmap to the exporter.
>>> */
>>> if (bo->ttm && (bo->ttm->page_flags &
>>> TTM_PAGE_FLAG_EXTERNAL)) {
>>> - dma_resv_unlock(bo->base.resv);
>>> - return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
>>> + if (!(bo->ttm->page_flags &
>>> TTM_PAGE_FLAG_EXTERNAL_MAPPABLE)) {
>
> I saw there was previously a thought about testing for ttm_bo_type_sg
> here. Was that a dead end?
I guess the issue was userptr, which is also EXTERNAL and needs to be
rejected here, but underneath it's not type_sg.
Just having an explicit MAPPABLE flag or similar seemed the more
flexible approach? Happy to try out other ideas.
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas
>
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list