[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [01/25] dma-buf: add dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked v5

[Christian König]

Am 24.09.21 um 11:11 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin:
>
> On 23/09/2021 14:05, Patchwork wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>   *
>>
>>     igt at gem_busy@busy at all:
>>
>>       o fi-apl-guc: PASS
>> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10630/fi-apl-guc/igt@gem_busy@busy@all.html>
>>         -> FAIL
>> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21144/fi-apl-guc/igt@gem_busy@busy@all.html>
>>         +2 similar issues
>
> All seem to be the same failure:
>
> (gem_busy:874) igt_dummyload-CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function 
> igt_spin_factory, file ../lib/igt_dummyload.c:490:
> (gem_busy:874) igt_dummyload-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: 
> gem_bo_busy(fd, spin->handle)
>
> Which is saying spinner which was just submitted is not immediately 
> reported as busy. And that sounds impossible. Must be a pretty basic 
> bug somewhere which I don't immediately see. Like unlocked iterator 
> failing to walk the fences or something.

I was just to write a mail to you about this since I'm currently 
scratching my head what exactly goes wrong here.

Is there an igt test which uses only vgem and currently fails which I 
could also run on AMD hardware?

Thanks,
Christian.

>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko