[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/display: Wait PSR2 get out of deep sleep to update pipe
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Fri Sep 24 14:35:10 UTC 2021
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 12:46:11PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> Alderlake-P was getting 'max time under evasion' messages when PSR2
> was enabled, this is due PIPE_SCANLINE/PIPEDSL returning 0 over a
> period of time longer than VBLANK_EVASION_TIME_US.
>
> For PSR1 we had the same issue so intel_psr_wait_for_idle() was
> implemented to wait for PSR1 to get into idle state but nothing was
> done for PSR2.
>
> For PSR2 we can't only wait for idle state as PSR2 tends to keep
> into sleep state that means it is ready to send selective updates.
>
> To do so it was necessary to add intel_wait_for_condition(), this
> takes as parameter a function that will return true when the desidered
> condition is meet.
>
> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> ---
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c | 3 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 64 ++++++++++++-------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 5 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 47 ++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h | 7 ++
> 5 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> index 68f4ba8c46e75..662596adb1da6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> @@ -303,8 +303,7 @@ psr_source_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct seq_file *m)
> };
> val = intel_de_read(dev_priv,
> EDP_PSR2_STATUS(intel_dp->psr.transcoder));
> - status_val = (val & EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK) >>
> - EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT;
> + status_val = REG_FIELD_GET(EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK, val);
> if (status_val < ARRAY_SIZE(live_status))
> status = live_status[status_val];
> } else {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index 19a96d3c4acf4..a2e4ef42be60a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -1796,15 +1796,33 @@ void intel_psr_post_plane_update(const struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> _intel_psr_post_plane_update(state, crtc_state);
> }
>
> -/**
> - * psr_wait_for_idle - wait for PSR1 to idle
> - * @intel_dp: Intel DP
> - * @out_value: PSR status in case of failure
> - *
> - * Returns: 0 on success or -ETIMEOUT if PSR status does not idle.
> - *
> - */
> -static int psr_wait_for_idle(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u32 *out_value)
> +static bool _is_psr2_read_for_pipe_update(void *data)
> +{
> + struct intel_dp *intel_dp = data;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = intel_uncore_read_fw(&dev_priv->uncore,
> + EDP_PSR2_STATUS(intel_dp->psr.transcoder));
> + val &= EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK;
> +
> + return val == EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_SLEEP || val == EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_IDLE;
> +}
> +
> +static int _psr2_ready_for_pipe_update_locked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> + unsigned int fw;
> +
> + fw = intel_uncore_forcewake_for_reg(&dev_priv->uncore,
> + EDP_PSR2_STATUS(intel_dp->psr.transcoder),
> + FW_REG_READ);
> + return intel_wait_for_condition(&dev_priv->uncore,
> + _is_psr2_read_for_pipe_update,
> + intel_dp, fw, 50);
> +}
> +
> +static int _psr1_ready_for_pipe_update_locked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>
> @@ -1814,15 +1832,13 @@ static int psr_wait_for_idle(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u32 *out_value)
> * exit training time + 1.5 ms of aux channel handshake. 50 ms is
> * defensive enough to cover everything.
> */
> - return __intel_wait_for_register(&dev_priv->uncore,
> - EDP_PSR_STATUS(intel_dp->psr.transcoder),
> - EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK,
> - EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_IDLE, 2, 50,
> - out_value);
> + return intel_de_wait_for_clear(dev_priv,
> + EDP_PSR_STATUS(intel_dp->psr.transcoder),
> + EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK, 50);
> }
>
> /**
> - * intel_psr_wait_for_idle - wait for PSR1 to idle
> + * intel_psr_wait_for_idle - wait for PSR be ready for a pipe update
> * @new_crtc_state: new CRTC state
> *
> * This function is expected to be called from pipe_update_start() where it is
> @@ -1839,19 +1855,23 @@ void intel_psr_wait_for_idle(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
> for_each_intel_encoder_mask_with_psr(&dev_priv->drm, encoder,
> new_crtc_state->uapi.encoder_mask) {
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
> - u32 psr_status;
> + int ret;
>
> mutex_lock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
> - if (!intel_dp->psr.enabled || intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled) {
> +
> + if (!intel_dp->psr.enabled) {
> mutex_unlock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
> continue;
> }
>
> - /* when the PSR1 is enabled */
> - if (psr_wait_for_idle(intel_dp, &psr_status))
> - drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
> - "PSR idle timed out 0x%x, atomic update may fail\n",
> - psr_status);
> + if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled)
> + ret = _psr2_ready_for_pipe_update_locked(intel_dp);
> + else
> + ret = _psr1_ready_for_pipe_update_locked(intel_dp);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + drm_err(&dev_priv->drm, "PSR wait timed out, atomic update may fail\n");
> +
> mutex_unlock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
> }
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index cad84c3b864bf..a827f5bf973cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -4698,8 +4698,9 @@ enum {
> #define _PSR2_STATUS_A 0x60940
> #define _PSR2_STATUS_EDP 0x6f940
> #define EDP_PSR2_STATUS(tran) _MMIO_TRANS2(tran, _PSR2_STATUS_A)
> -#define EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK (0xf << 28)
> -#define EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT 28
> +#define EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK REG_GENMASK(31, 28)
> +#define EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_SLEEP REG_FIELD_PREP(EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK, 0x3)
> +#define EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_IDLE REG_FIELD_PREP(EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK, 0x0)
>
> #define _PSR2_SU_STATUS_A 0x60914
> #define _PSR2_SU_STATUS_EDP 0x6f914
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> index 678a99de07fee..1b3ea7318c2d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -2383,6 +2383,28 @@ int __intel_wait_for_register_fw(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> #undef done
> }
>
> +static int __intel_wait_for_condition_fw(bool (*func)(void *data), void *data,
> + unsigned int fast_timeout_us,
> + unsigned int slow_timeout_ms)
> +{
> +#define done (func(data))
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Catch any overuse of this function */
> + might_sleep_if(slow_timeout_ms);
> + GEM_BUG_ON(fast_timeout_us > 20000);
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!fast_timeout_us && !slow_timeout_ms);
> +
> + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> + if (fast_timeout_us && fast_timeout_us <= 20000)
> + ret = _wait_for_atomic(done, fast_timeout_us, 0);
> + if (ret && slow_timeout_ms)
> + ret = wait_for(done, slow_timeout_ms);
Is there a particular reason for these complicated wrappers
instead of just using wait_for() directly?
> +
> + return ret;
> +#undef done
> +}
> +
> /**
> * __intel_wait_for_register - wait until register matches expected state
> * @uncore: the struct intel_uncore
> @@ -2442,6 +2464,31 @@ int __intel_wait_for_register(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +int intel_wait_for_condition(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> + bool (*func)(void *data),
> + void *data,
> + unsigned int fw,
> + unsigned int slow_timeout_ms)
> +{
> + unsigned int fast_timeout_us = 2;
> + int ret;
> +
> + might_sleep_if(slow_timeout_ms);
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(&uncore->lock);
> + intel_uncore_forcewake_get__locked(uncore, fw);
> +
> + ret = __intel_wait_for_condition_fw(func, data, fast_timeout_us, 0);
> +
> + intel_uncore_forcewake_put__locked(uncore, fw);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&uncore->lock);
> +
> + if (ret && slow_timeout_ms)
> + ret = __wait_for(, (func(data)), slow_timeout_ms * 1000, 10, 1000);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> bool intel_uncore_unclaimed_mmio(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
> {
> bool ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
> index 2f31c50eeae24..d6455824cbc56 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
> @@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ int __intel_wait_for_register_fw(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> unsigned int fast_timeout_us,
> unsigned int slow_timeout_ms,
> u32 *out_value);
> +
> static inline int
> intel_wait_for_register_fw(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> i915_reg_t reg,
> @@ -293,6 +294,12 @@ intel_wait_for_register_fw(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> 2, timeout_ms, NULL);
> }
>
> +int intel_wait_for_condition(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> + bool (*func)(void *data),
> + void *data,
> + unsigned int fw,
> + unsigned int timeout_ms);
> +
> /* register access functions */
> #define __raw_read(x__, s__) \
> static inline u##x__ __raw_uncore_read##x__(const struct intel_uncore *uncore, \
> --
> 2.33.0
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list