[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use direction definition DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL instead of PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
Cai Huoqing
caihuoqing at baidu.com
Sat Sep 25 12:46:12 UTC 2021
Replace direction definition PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
with DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, because it helps to enhance readability
and avoid possible inconsistency.
Signed-off-by: Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing at baidu.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c | 17 ++++++++---------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c
index a74b72f50cc9..afb35d2e5c73 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static int init_fake_lmem_bar(struct intel_memory_region *mem)
mem->remap_addr = dma_map_resource(i915->drm.dev,
mem->region.start,
mem->fake_mappable.size,
- PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
+ DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS);
if (dma_mapping_error(i915->drm.dev, mem->remap_addr)) {
drm_mm_remove_node(&mem->fake_mappable);
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static void release_fake_lmem_bar(struct intel_memory_region *mem)
dma_unmap_resource(mem->i915->drm.dev,
mem->remap_addr,
mem->fake_mappable.size,
- PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
+ DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS);
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c
index e5c2fdfc20e3..53d0cb327539 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ static void ppgtt_free_spt(struct intel_vgpu_ppgtt_spt *spt)
trace_spt_free(spt->vgpu->id, spt, spt->guest_page.type);
dma_unmap_page(kdev, spt->shadow_page.mfn << I915_GTT_PAGE_SHIFT, 4096,
- PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
+ DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
radix_tree_delete(&spt->vgpu->gtt.spt_tree, spt->shadow_page.mfn);
@@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static struct intel_vgpu_ppgtt_spt *ppgtt_alloc_spt(
*/
spt->shadow_page.type = type;
daddr = dma_map_page(kdev, spt->shadow_page.page,
- 0, 4096, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
+ 0, 4096, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
if (dma_mapping_error(kdev, daddr)) {
gvt_vgpu_err("fail to map dma addr\n");
ret = -EINVAL;
@@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ static struct intel_vgpu_ppgtt_spt *ppgtt_alloc_spt(
return spt;
err_unmap_dma:
- dma_unmap_page(kdev, daddr, PAGE_SIZE, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
+ dma_unmap_page(kdev, daddr, PAGE_SIZE, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
err_free_spt:
free_spt(spt);
return ERR_PTR(ret);
@@ -2409,8 +2409,7 @@ static int alloc_scratch_pages(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu,
return -ENOMEM;
}
- daddr = dma_map_page(dev, virt_to_page(scratch_pt), 0,
- 4096, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
+ daddr = dma_map_page(dev, virt_to_page(scratch_pt), 0, 4096, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
if (dma_mapping_error(dev, daddr)) {
gvt_vgpu_err("fail to dmamap scratch_pt\n");
__free_page(virt_to_page(scratch_pt));
@@ -2461,7 +2460,7 @@ static int release_scratch_page_tree(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
if (vgpu->gtt.scratch_pt[i].page != NULL) {
daddr = (dma_addr_t)(vgpu->gtt.scratch_pt[i].page_mfn <<
I915_GTT_PAGE_SHIFT);
- dma_unmap_page(dev, daddr, 4096, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
+ dma_unmap_page(dev, daddr, 4096, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
__free_page(vgpu->gtt.scratch_pt[i].page);
vgpu->gtt.scratch_pt[i].page = NULL;
vgpu->gtt.scratch_pt[i].page_mfn = 0;
@@ -2741,7 +2740,7 @@ int intel_gvt_init_gtt(struct intel_gvt *gvt)
}
daddr = dma_map_page(dev, virt_to_page(page), 0,
- 4096, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
+ 4096, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
if (dma_mapping_error(dev, daddr)) {
gvt_err("fail to dmamap scratch ggtt page\n");
__free_page(virt_to_page(page));
@@ -2755,7 +2754,7 @@ int intel_gvt_init_gtt(struct intel_gvt *gvt)
ret = setup_spt_oos(gvt);
if (ret) {
gvt_err("fail to initialize SPT oos\n");
- dma_unmap_page(dev, daddr, 4096, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
+ dma_unmap_page(dev, daddr, 4096, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
__free_page(gvt->gtt.scratch_page);
return ret;
}
@@ -2779,7 +2778,7 @@ void intel_gvt_clean_gtt(struct intel_gvt *gvt)
dma_addr_t daddr = (dma_addr_t)(gvt->gtt.scratch_mfn <<
I915_GTT_PAGE_SHIFT);
- dma_unmap_page(dev, daddr, 4096, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
+ dma_unmap_page(dev, daddr, 4096, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
__free_page(gvt->gtt.scratch_page);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
index 7efa386449d1..20b82fb036f8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ static int gvt_dma_map_page(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, unsigned long gfn,
return ret;
/* Setup DMA mapping. */
- *dma_addr = dma_map_page(dev, page, 0, size, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
+ *dma_addr = dma_map_page(dev, page, 0, size, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
if (dma_mapping_error(dev, *dma_addr)) {
gvt_vgpu_err("DMA mapping failed for pfn 0x%lx, ret %d\n",
page_to_pfn(page), ret);
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static void gvt_dma_unmap_page(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, unsigned long gfn,
{
struct device *dev = vgpu->gvt->gt->i915->drm.dev;
- dma_unmap_page(dev, dma_addr, size, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
+ dma_unmap_page(dev, dma_addr, size, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
gvt_unpin_guest_page(vgpu, gfn, size);
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
index 36489be4896b..cd5f2348a187 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ int i915_gem_gtt_prepare_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
do {
if (dma_map_sg_attrs(obj->base.dev->dev,
pages->sgl, pages->nents,
- PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
+ DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC |
DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING |
DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN))
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ void i915_gem_gtt_finish_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
usleep_range(100, 250);
dma_unmap_sg(i915->drm.dev, pages->sgl, pages->nents,
- PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
+ DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
}
/**
--
2.25.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list