[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/12] drm/edid: refactor EDID block status printing
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Thu Apr 7 11:54:13 UTC 2022
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 12:14:29PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Split out a function to log EDID block status. The printouts get changed
> slightly.
>
> Unfortunately, not all users will have struct drm_device available, so
> we convert to pr_* debug logging instead of drm device based logging.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index f062d1715ec3..3d04d63464ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -1729,6 +1729,50 @@ static bool edid_block_valid(const void *block, bool base)
> edid_block_tag(block));
> }
>
> +static void edid_block_status_print(enum edid_block_status status,
> + const struct edid *block,
> + int block_num)
> +{
> + switch (status) {
> + case EDID_BLOCK_OK:
> + break;
> + case EDID_BLOCK_NULL:
> + pr_debug("EDID block %d pointer is NULL\n", block_num);
> + break;
> + case EDID_BLOCK_ZERO:
> + pr_notice("EDID block %d is all zeroes\n", block_num);
> + break;
> + case EDID_BLOCK_HEADER_CORRUPT:
> + pr_notice("EDID has corrupt header\n");
> + break;
> + case EDID_BLOCK_HEADER_REPAIR:
> + pr_debug("EDID corrupt header needs repair\n");
> + break;
> + case EDID_BLOCK_HEADER_FIXED:
> + pr_debug("EDID corrupt header fixed\n");
> + break;
> + case EDID_BLOCK_CHECKSUM:
> + if (edid_block_status_valid(status, edid_block_tag(block))) {
> + pr_debug("EDID block %d (tag 0x%02x) checksum is invalid, remainder is %d, ignoring\n",
> + block_num, edid_block_tag(block),
> + edid_block_compute_checksum(block));
> + } else {
> + pr_notice("EDID block %d (tag 0x%02x) checksum is invalid, remainder is %d\n",
> + block_num, edid_block_tag(block),
> + edid_block_compute_checksum(block));
> + }
> + break;
> + case EDID_BLOCK_VERSION:
> + pr_notice("EDID has major version %d, instead of 1\n",
> + block->version);
> + break;
> + default:
> + pr_debug("EDID block %d unknown edid block status code %d\n",
> + block_num, status);
Maybe this should complaing a bit more loudly. Indicates a bug in the
code no?
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> + break;
> + }
> +}
> +
> /**
> * drm_edid_block_valid - Sanity check the EDID block (base or extension)
> * @raw_edid: pointer to raw EDID block
> @@ -1775,33 +1819,16 @@ bool drm_edid_block_valid(u8 *_block, int block_num, bool print_bad_edid,
> *edid_corrupt = true;
> }
>
> + edid_block_status_print(status, block, block_num);
> +
> /* Determine whether we can use this block with this status. */
> valid = edid_block_status_valid(status, edid_block_tag(block));
>
> - /* Some fairly random status printouts. */
> - if (status == EDID_BLOCK_CHECKSUM) {
> - if (valid) {
> - DRM_DEBUG("EDID block checksum is invalid, remainder is %d\n",
> - edid_block_compute_checksum(block));
> - DRM_DEBUG("Assuming a KVM switch modified the block but left the original checksum\n");
> - } else if (print_bad_edid) {
> - DRM_NOTE("EDID block checksum is invalid, remainder is %d\n",
> - edid_block_compute_checksum(block));
> - }
> - } else if (status == EDID_BLOCK_VERSION) {
> - DRM_NOTE("EDID has major version %d, instead of 1\n",
> - block->version);
> - }
> -
> - if (!valid && print_bad_edid) {
> - if (status == EDID_BLOCK_ZERO) {
> - pr_notice("EDID block is all zeroes\n");
> - } else {
> - pr_notice("Raw EDID:\n");
> - print_hex_dump(KERN_NOTICE,
> - " \t", DUMP_PREFIX_NONE, 16, 1,
> - block, EDID_LENGTH, false);
> - }
> + if (!valid && print_bad_edid && status != EDID_BLOCK_ZERO) {
> + pr_notice("Raw EDID:\n");
> + print_hex_dump(KERN_NOTICE,
> + " \t", DUMP_PREFIX_NONE, 16, 1,
> + block, EDID_LENGTH, false);
> }
>
> return valid;
> --
> 2.30.2
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list