[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: fix i915_gem_object_wait_moving_fence
Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Fri Apr 8 05:00:44 UTC 2022
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 05:45:32PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
>All of CI is just failing with the following, which prevents loading of
>the module:
>
> i915 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* Scratch setup failed
>
>Best guess is that this comes from the pin_map() for the scratch page,
>which does an i915_gem_object_wait_moving_fence() somewhere. It looks
>like this now calls into dma_resv_wait_timeout() which can return the
>remaining timeout, leading to the caller thinking this is an error.
>
>Fixes: 1d7f5e6c5240 ("drm/i915: drop bo->moving dependency")
>Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
>Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
>index 2998d895a6b3..1c88d4121658 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
>@@ -772,9 +772,14 @@ int i915_gem_object_get_moving_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> int i915_gem_object_wait_moving_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> bool intr)
> {
>+ long ret;
>+
> assert_object_held(obj);
>- return dma_resv_wait_timeout(obj->base. resv, DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL,
>- intr, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
>+
>+ ret = dma_resv_wait_timeout(obj->base. resv, DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL,
>+ intr, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
>+
>+ return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
shouldn't == 0 also be an error since it would be a timeout?
Lucas De Marchi
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list