[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Use i915_probe_error instead of drm_err

Anshuman Gupta anshuman.gupta at intel.com
Thu Apr 14 06:41:44 UTC 2022


On 2022-04-13 at 04:18:52 +0530, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
> This will ensure we don't have false positives when we run
> error injection tests.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 42 ++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
> index b170238aa15c..639de3c10545 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
> @@ -152,8 +152,8 @@ static int slpc_query_task_state(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
>  
>  	ret = guc_action_slpc_query(guc, offset);
>  	if (unlikely(ret))
As commit logs describe, this code patch can hit, when we run error injection test.
Do we need unlikely() here?
Br,
Anshuman Gupta.
> -		drm_err(&i915->drm, "Failed to query task state (%pe)\n",
> -			ERR_PTR(ret));
> +		i915_probe_error(i915, "Failed to query task state (%pe)\n",
> +				 ERR_PTR(ret));
>  
>  	drm_clflush_virt_range(slpc->vaddr, SLPC_PAGE_SIZE_BYTES);
>  
> @@ -170,8 +170,8 @@ static int slpc_set_param(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u8 id, u32 value)
>  
>  	ret = guc_action_slpc_set_param(guc, id, value);
>  	if (ret)
> -		drm_err(&i915->drm, "Failed to set param %d to %u (%pe)\n",
> -			id, value, ERR_PTR(ret));
> +		i915_probe_error(i915, "Failed to set param %d to %u (%pe)\n",
> +				 id, value, ERR_PTR(ret));
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -211,8 +211,8 @@ static int slpc_force_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 freq)
>  				     SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ,
>  				     freq);
>  		if (ret)
> -			drm_err(&i915->drm, "Unable to force min freq to %u: %d",
> -				freq, ret);
> +			i915_probe_error(i915, "Unable to force min freq to %u: %d",
> +					 freq, ret);
>  	}
>  
>  	return ret;
> @@ -247,9 +247,9 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_init(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
>  
>  	err = intel_guc_allocate_and_map_vma(guc, size, &slpc->vma, (void **)&slpc->vaddr);
>  	if (unlikely(err)) {
> -		drm_err(&i915->drm,
> -			"Failed to allocate SLPC struct (err=%pe)\n",
> -			ERR_PTR(err));
> +		i915_probe_error(i915,
> +				 "Failed to allocate SLPC struct (err=%pe)\n",
> +				 ERR_PTR(err));
>  		return err;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -316,15 +316,15 @@ static int slpc_reset(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
>  	ret = guc_action_slpc_reset(guc, offset);
>  
>  	if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
> -		drm_err(&i915->drm, "SLPC reset action failed (%pe)\n",
> -			ERR_PTR(ret));
> +		i915_probe_error(i915, "SLPC reset action failed (%pe)\n",
> +				 ERR_PTR(ret));
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!ret) {
>  		if (wait_for(slpc_is_running(slpc), SLPC_RESET_TIMEOUT_MS)) {
> -			drm_err(&i915->drm, "SLPC not enabled! State = %s\n",
> -				slpc_get_state_string(slpc));
> +			i915_probe_error(i915, "SLPC not enabled! State = %s\n",
> +					 slpc_get_state_string(slpc));
>  			return -EIO;
>  		}
>  	}
> @@ -616,8 +616,8 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
>  
>  	ret = slpc_reset(slpc);
>  	if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
> -		drm_err(&i915->drm, "SLPC Reset event returned (%pe)\n",
> -			ERR_PTR(ret));
> +		i915_probe_error(i915, "SLPC Reset event returned (%pe)\n",
> +				 ERR_PTR(ret));
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -632,24 +632,24 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
>  	/* Ignore efficient freq and set min to platform min */
>  	ret = slpc_ignore_eff_freq(slpc, true);
>  	if (unlikely(ret)) {
> -		drm_err(&i915->drm, "Failed to set SLPC min to RPn (%pe)\n",
> -			ERR_PTR(ret));
> +		i915_probe_error(i915, "Failed to set SLPC min to RPn (%pe)\n",
> +				 ERR_PTR(ret));
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Set SLPC max limit to RP0 */
>  	ret = slpc_use_fused_rp0(slpc);
>  	if (unlikely(ret)) {
> -		drm_err(&i915->drm, "Failed to set SLPC max to RP0 (%pe)\n",
> -			ERR_PTR(ret));
> +		i915_probe_error(i915, "Failed to set SLPC max to RP0 (%pe)\n",
> +				 ERR_PTR(ret));
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Revert SLPC min/max to softlimits if necessary */
>  	ret = slpc_set_softlimits(slpc);
>  	if (unlikely(ret)) {
> -		drm_err(&i915->drm, "Failed to set SLPC softlimits (%pe)\n",
> -			ERR_PTR(ret));
> +		i915_probe_error(i915, "Failed to set SLPC softlimits (%pe)\n",
> +				 ERR_PTR(ret));
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.35.1
> 


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list