[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Fri Aug 5 14:39:44 UTC 2022


On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 10:46:57AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Hi Rodrigo,
> 
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 13:33:06 -0400
> Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Dave and Daniel,
> > 
> > Here goes drm-intel-next-fixes-2022-08-04:
> > 
> > - disable pci resize on 32-bit systems (Nirmoy)
> > - don't leak the ccs state (Matt)
> > - TLB invalidation fixes (Chris)
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Rodrigo.
> > 
> > The following changes since commit 2bc7ea71a73747a77e7f83bc085b0d2393235410:
> > 
> >   Merge tag 'topic/nouveau-misc-2022-07-27' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm into drm-next (2022-07-27 11:34:07 +1000)
> > 
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> > 
> >   git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-intel tags/drm-intel-next-fixes-2022-08-04
> > 
> > for you to fetch changes up to e57b9369e0c6f60155027e120fafd4b57e385b71:
> > 
> >   drm/i915/gt: Batch TLB invalidations (2022-08-01 09:48:06 -0400)
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > - disable pci resize on 32-bit systems (Nirmoy)
> > - don't leak the ccs state (Matt)
> > - TLB invalidation fixes (Chris)
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Chris Wilson (4):
> >       drm/i915/gt: Ignore TLB invalidations on idle engines
> >       drm/i915/gt: Invalidate TLB of the OA unit at TLB invalidations
> >       drm/i915/gt: Skip TLB invalidations once wedged
> 
> >       drm/i915/gt: Batch TLB invalidations
> This patch actually adds a regression due to a silly mistake. 
> The fix is here:
> 
> 	https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/496249/?series=106805&rev=4
>

Thank you for the heads up.

Since that patch is not merged yet, what are your recommendations here?
Should I remove this from drm-intel-next-fixes now? Which regression is worst?

Also dim has trouble with fixes for fixes in the same round.
Please ping me when you get that patch merged so I can pull that.

Thanks,
Rodrigo.

> Regards,
> Mauro


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list