[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/39] drm/i915: move cdclk_funcs to display.funcs

Jani Nikula jani.nikula at intel.com
Fri Aug 12 06:43:32 UTC 2022


On Fri, 12 Aug 2022, "Murthy, Arun R" <arun.r.murthy at intel.com> wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
>> index aafe548875cc..74e4ae0609b9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/types.h>
>>
>>  struct intel_atomic_state;
>> +struct intel_cdclk_funcs;
>>  struct intel_crtc;
>>  struct intel_crtc_state;
>>  struct intel_initial_plane_config;
>> @@ -32,6 +33,9 @@ struct intel_display {
>>       struct {
>>               /* Top level crtc-ish functions */
>>               const struct intel_display_funcs *crtc;
>> +
>> +             /* Display CDCLK functions */
>> +             const struct intel_cdclk_funcs *cdclk;
>
> Like having intel_cdclk_funcs *cdclk, will intel_display_funcs
> *display makes more sense and maintaining same terminology across the
> driver.

I was considering renaming it struct intel_crtc_funcs but it's not all
crtc either. But display is both too generic (these are *all* display
functions) and has a tautology (display.funcs.display). Dunno.

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list