[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm: Use original src rect while initializing damage iterator
Hogander, Jouni
jouni.hogander at intel.com
Fri Aug 19 06:30:21 UTC 2022
On Thu, 2022-08-11 at 18:23 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 04:49:56PM +0300, Jouni Högander wrote:
> > drm_plane_state->src might be modified by the driver. This is done
> > e.g. in i915 driver when there is bigger framebuffer than the plane
> > and there is some offset within framebuffer. I915 driver calculates
> > separate offset and adjusts src rect coords to be relative to this
> > offset. Damage clips are still relative to original src coords
> > provided by user-space.
> >
> > This patch ensures original coordinates provided by user-space are
> > used when initiliazing damage iterator.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
>
> Ah kunit test for this would be awesome. Iirc we have a few already
> for
> rect/damage stuff, defo should extend/fix those.
Can you please provide me some pointer to these tests? I have written
earlier one igt test which reveals this issue:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/103661/
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/104488/
> -Daniel
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_damage_helper.c | 11 +++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_damage_helper.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_damage_helper.c
> > index 937b699ac2a8..d8b2955e88fd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_damage_helper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_damage_helper.c
> > @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ drm_atomic_helper_damage_iter_init(struct
> > drm_atomic_helper_damage_iter *iter,
> > const struct drm_plane_state
> > *old_state,
> > const struct drm_plane_state *state)
> > {
> > + struct drm_rect src;
> > memset(iter, 0, sizeof(*iter));
> >
> > if (!state || !state->crtc || !state->fb || !state->visible)
> > @@ -233,10 +234,12 @@ drm_atomic_helper_damage_iter_init(struct
> > drm_atomic_helper_damage_iter *iter,
> > iter->num_clips = drm_plane_get_damage_clips_count(state);
> >
> > /* Round down for x1/y1 and round up for x2/y2 to catch all
> > pixels */
> > - iter->plane_src.x1 = state->src.x1 >> 16;
> > - iter->plane_src.y1 = state->src.y1 >> 16;
> > - iter->plane_src.x2 = (state->src.x2 >> 16) + !!(state->src.x2 &
> > 0xFFFF);
> > - iter->plane_src.y2 = (state->src.y2 >> 16) + !!(state->src.y2 &
> > 0xFFFF);
> > + src = drm_plane_state_src(state);
> > +
> > + iter->plane_src.x1 = src.x1 >> 16;
> > + iter->plane_src.y1 = src.y1 >> 16;
> > + iter->plane_src.x2 = (src.x2 >> 16) + !!(src.x2 & 0xFFFF);
> > + iter->plane_src.y2 = (src.y2 >> 16) + !!(src.y2 & 0xFFFF);
> >
> > if (!iter->clips || !drm_rect_equals(&state->src, &old_state-
> > >src)) {
> > iter->clips = NULL;
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list