[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/edid: Handle EDID 1.4 range descriptor h/vfreq offsets
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
Tue Aug 23 17:15:48 UTC 2022
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
> EDID 1.4 introduced some extra flags in the range
> descriptor to support min/max h/vfreq >= 255. Consult them
> to correctly parse the vfreq limits.
>
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6519
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
> include/drm/drm_edid.h | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index 90a5e26eafa8..4005dab6147d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -6020,12 +6020,14 @@ static void drm_parse_cea_ext(struct drm_connector *connector,
> }
>
> static
> -void get_monitor_range(const struct detailed_timing *timing,
> - void *info_monitor_range)
> +void get_monitor_range(const struct detailed_timing *timing, void *c)
> {
> - struct drm_monitor_range_info *monitor_range = info_monitor_range;
> + struct detailed_mode_closure *closure = c;
> + struct drm_display_info *info = &closure->connector->display_info;
> + struct drm_monitor_range_info *monitor_range = &info->monitor_range;
> const struct detailed_non_pixel *data = &timing->data.other_data;
> const struct detailed_data_monitor_range *range = &data->data.range;
> + const struct edid *edid = closure->drm_edid->edid;
>
> if (!is_display_descriptor(timing, EDID_DETAIL_MONITOR_RANGE))
> return;
> @@ -6041,18 +6043,28 @@ void get_monitor_range(const struct detailed_timing *timing,
>
> monitor_range->min_vfreq = range->min_vfreq;
> monitor_range->max_vfreq = range->max_vfreq;
> +
> + if (edid->revision >= 4) {
> + if (data->pad2 & DRM_EDID_RANGE_OFFSET_MIN_VFREQ)
> + monitor_range->min_vfreq += 255;
> + if (data->pad2 & DRM_EDID_RANGE_OFFSET_MAX_VFREQ)
> + monitor_range->max_vfreq += 255;
> + }
Nitpick, a combo where min vertical range has +255 offset but max
doesn't shouldn't be okay. But then, what are we going to do in that
case anyway? I guess the generic check would be min <= max. Also, the
+255 offset range is 256..510, not 256..(255+255). Again, what to do if
that's what the EDID has? *shrug*.
Anyway, what's broken here (and probably impacts the testing in the
referenced bug) is that the struct drm_monitor_range_info members are u8
and this overflows.
With that fixed, whether or not you decide to do anything about the
nitpicks,
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
Side note, git grep for monitor_range reveals amdgpu are doing their own
thing for the parsing. *sigh*.
> }
>
> static void drm_get_monitor_range(struct drm_connector *connector,
> const struct drm_edid *drm_edid)
> {
> - struct drm_display_info *info = &connector->display_info;
> + const struct drm_display_info *info = &connector->display_info;
> + struct detailed_mode_closure closure = {
> + .connector = connector,
> + .drm_edid = drm_edid,
> + };
>
> if (!version_greater(drm_edid, 1, 1))
> return;
>
> - drm_for_each_detailed_block(drm_edid, get_monitor_range,
> - &info->monitor_range);
> + drm_for_each_detailed_block(drm_edid, get_monitor_range, &closure);
>
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Supported Monitor Refresh rate range is %d Hz - %d Hz\n",
> info->monitor_range.min_vfreq,
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_edid.h b/include/drm/drm_edid.h
> index 2181977ae683..d81da97cad6e 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_edid.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_edid.h
> @@ -92,6 +92,11 @@ struct detailed_data_string {
> u8 str[13];
> } __attribute__((packed));
>
> +#define DRM_EDID_RANGE_OFFSET_MIN_VFREQ (1 << 0)
> +#define DRM_EDID_RANGE_OFFSET_MAX_VFREQ (1 << 1)
> +#define DRM_EDID_RANGE_OFFSET_MIN_HFREQ (1 << 2)
> +#define DRM_EDID_RANGE_OFFSET_MAX_HFREQ (1 << 3)
> +
> #define DRM_EDID_DEFAULT_GTF_SUPPORT_FLAG 0x00
> #define DRM_EDID_RANGE_LIMITS_ONLY_FLAG 0x01
> #define DRM_EDID_SECONDARY_GTF_SUPPORT_FLAG 0x02
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list