[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: do not try misaligned_pin test on unmappable memory
Matthew Auld
matthew.auld at intel.com
Thu Aug 25 15:13:58 UTC 2022
On 25/08/2022 15:52, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> In case of Small BAR configurations stolen local memory can be unmappable.
> Trying to test it causes -ENOSPC error from _i915_gem_object_stolen_init.
>
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6565
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda at intel.com>
Ah right. That failure makes perfect sense now :)
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
> index fb5e6196347925..667c4c004bdbcf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
> @@ -1164,6 +1164,10 @@ static int misaligned_pin(struct i915_address_space *vm,
> if (hole_size < 3 * min_alignment)
> continue;
>
> + /* avoid -ENOSPC on unmappable memory */
> + if (!mr->io_size)
> + continue;
We could also pass I915_BO_ALLOC_GPU_ONLY when calling
i915_gem_object_create_region(), since nothing actually needs to CPU
access that memory, and then we still get coverage here for stolen? What
do you think?
> +
> /* we can't test < 4k alignment due to flags being encoded in lower bits */
> if (min_alignment != I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_4K) {
> err = misaligned_case(vm, mr, addr + (min_alignment / 2), size, flags);
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list