[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: do not try misaligned_pin test on unmappable memory

Matthew Auld matthew.auld at intel.com
Thu Aug 25 15:13:58 UTC 2022


On 25/08/2022 15:52, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> In case of Small BAR configurations stolen local memory can be unmappable.
> Trying to test it causes -ENOSPC error from _i915_gem_object_stolen_init.
> 
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6565
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda at intel.com>

Ah right. That failure makes perfect sense now :)

> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c | 4 ++++
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
> index fb5e6196347925..667c4c004bdbcf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
> @@ -1164,6 +1164,10 @@ static int misaligned_pin(struct i915_address_space *vm,
>   		if (hole_size < 3 * min_alignment)
>   			continue;
>   
> +		/* avoid -ENOSPC on unmappable memory */
> +		if (!mr->io_size)
> +			continue;

We could also pass I915_BO_ALLOC_GPU_ONLY when calling 
i915_gem_object_create_region(), since nothing actually needs to CPU 
access that memory, and then we still get coverage here for stolen? What 
do you think?

> +
>   		/* we can't test < 4k alignment due to flags being encoded in lower bits */
>   		if (min_alignment != I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_4K) {
>   			err = misaligned_case(vm, mr, addr + (min_alignment / 2), size, flags);


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list