[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/mtl: Initial display workarounds
Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Thu Dec 1 23:27:25 UTC 2022
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 03:01:05PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 03:17:08PM -0800, Matt Atwood wrote:
>> From: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
>>
>> This patch introduces initial workarounds for mtl platform
>>
>> Bspec: 66624
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c | 4 +++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c | 3 ++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++-------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 4 ++++
>> 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
>> index b5ee5ea0d010..8f269553d826 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
>> @@ -1095,7 +1095,9 @@ static int intel_fbc_check_plane(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>> }
>>
>> /* Wa_14016291713 */
>> - if (IS_DISPLAY_VER(i915, 12, 13) && crtc_state->has_psr) {
>> + if ((IS_DISPLAY_VER(i915, 12, 13) ||
>> + IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(i915, STEP_A0, STEP_C0)) &&
>> + crtc_state->has_psr) {
>> plane_state->no_fbc_reason = "PSR1 enabled (Wa_14016291713)";
>> return 0;
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c
>> index e82f8a07e2b0..efa2da080f62 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c
>> @@ -537,7 +537,8 @@ void hsw_write_infoframe(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>> 0);
>>
>> /* Wa_14013475917 */
>> - if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 13 && crtc_state->has_psr &&
>> + if ((DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 13 ||
>> + IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0)) && crtc_state->has_psr &&
>> type == DP_SDP_VSC)
>> return;
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
>> index 5b678916e6db..7982157fb1ff 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
>> @@ -797,7 +797,7 @@ static bool psr2_granularity_check(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> return intel_dp->psr.su_y_granularity == 4;
>>
>> /*
>> - * adl_p and display 14+ platforms has 1 line granularity.
>> + * adl_p and mtl platforms has 1 line granularity.
>> * For other platforms with SW tracking we can adjust the y coordinates
>> * to match sink requirement if multiple of 4.
>> */
>> @@ -1170,11 +1170,14 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> PSR2_ADD_VERTICAL_LINE_COUNT);
>>
>> /*
>> - * Wa_16014451276:adlp
>> + * Wa_16014451276:adlp,mtl[a0,b0]
>
>These days we don't really add steppings in these comments; at best
>they're just reiterating information that can be easily seen from the
>code below, at worst they get out of sync and cause confusion. I'd drop
>the "[a0,b0]" part (which also isn't accurate anyway if you're using
>range notation...it would be "[a0..b0)" in that case).
>
>Honestly even the list of platform names on workarounds is of
>questionable value and I'm thinking about writing a patch that just
>drops all of them throughout i915, leaving just the workaround lineage
>number. Maybe I'd keep the platform names in the few cases where we
>have multiple workaround numbers (with different sets of platforms) all
>requesting the same programming of a register...
I'd be happy to ack such patch :)
>
>> * All supported adlp panels have 1-based X granularity, this may
>> * cause issues if non-supported panels are used.
>> */
>> - if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv))
>> + if (IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0))
>> + intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, MTL_CHICKEN_TRANS(cpu_transcoder), 0,
>> + ADLP_1_BASED_X_GRANULARITY);
>> + else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv))
>> intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, CHICKEN_TRANS(cpu_transcoder), 0,
>> ADLP_1_BASED_X_GRANULARITY);
>>
>> @@ -1185,8 +1188,12 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> TRANS_SET_CONTEXT_LATENCY_MASK,
>> TRANS_SET_CONTEXT_LATENCY_VALUE(1));
>>
>> - /* Wa_16012604467:adlp */
>> - if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv))
>> + /* Wa_16012604467:adlp,mtl[a0,b0] */
>> + if (IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0))
>> + intel_de_rmw(dev_priv,
>> + MTL_CLKGATE_DIS_TRANS(cpu_transcoder), 0,
>> + MTL_CLKGATE_DIS_TRANS_DMASC_GATING_DIS);
>> + else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv))
>> intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, CLKGATE_DIS_MISC, 0,
>> CLKGATE_DIS_MISC_DMASC_GATING_DIS);
>>
>> @@ -1362,8 +1369,12 @@ static void intel_psr_disable_locked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> TRANS_SET_CONTEXT_LATENCY(intel_dp->psr.transcoder),
>> TRANS_SET_CONTEXT_LATENCY_MASK, 0);
>>
>> - /* Wa_16012604467:adlp */
>> - if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv))
>> + /* Wa_16012604467:adlp,mtl[a0,b0] */
>> + if (IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0))
>> + intel_de_rmw(dev_priv,
>> + MTL_CLKGATE_DIS_TRANS(intel_dp->psr.transcoder),
>> + MTL_CLKGATE_DIS_TRANS_DMASC_GATING_DIS, 0);
>> + else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv))
>> intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, CLKGATE_DIS_MISC,
>> CLKGATE_DIS_MISC_DMASC_GATING_DIS, 0);
>>
>> @@ -1625,7 +1636,7 @@ static void psr2_man_trk_ctl_calc(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>>
>> if (full_update) {
>> /*
>> - * Not applying Wa_14014971508:adlp as we do not support the
>> + * Not applying Wa_14014971508:adlp,mtl as we do not support the
>> * feature that requires this workaround.
>> */
>> val |= man_trk_ctl_single_full_frame_bit_get(dev_priv);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> index a8a5bd426e78..ecb027626a21 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> @@ -727,6 +727,10 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>> (IS_SUBPLATFORM(__i915, INTEL_METEORLAKE, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_##variant) && \
>> IS_GRAPHICS_STEP(__i915, since, until))
>>
>> +#define IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(__i915, since, until) \
>> + (DISPLAY_VER(__i915) == 14 && \
>
>As Tvrtko noted, this could come back to bite us in the future if
>another platform shows up with 14.10, 14.50, etc. MTL has exactly
>version 14.0, so best to make this
>
> DISPLAY_VER_FULL(__i915) == IP_VER(14, 0)
>
>so that it won't automatically capture future platforms by accident.
I think it's better to do a platform check as the other platforms are
doing. See DG2 for example:
#define IS_DG2_DISPLAY_STEP(__i915, since, until) \
(IS_DG2(__i915) && \
IS_DISPLAY_STEP(__i915, since, until))
Lucas De Marchi
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list