[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915/dsi: add support for ICL+ native MIPI GPIO sequence
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Tue Dec 13 03:48:10 UTC 2022
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 04:37:53PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Starting from ICL, the default for MIPI GPIO sequences seems to be using
> native GPIOs i.e. GPIOs available in the GPU. These native GPIOs reuse
> many pins that quite frankly seem scary to poke based on the VBT
> sequences. We pretty much have to trust that the board is configured
> such that the relevant HPD, PP_CONTROL and GPIO bits aren't used for
> anything else.
>
> MIPI sequence v4 also adds a flag to fall back to non-native sequences.
>
> v3:
> - Fix -Wbitwise-conditional-parentheses (kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>)
>
> v2:
> - Fix HPD pin output set (impacts GPIOs 0 and 5)
> - Fix GPIO data output direction set (impacts GPIOs 4 and 9)
> - Reduce register accesses to single intel_de_rwm()
>
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6131
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c
> index fce69fa446d5..f19020074ee3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c
> @@ -41,9 +41,11 @@
>
> #include "i915_drv.h"
> #include "i915_reg.h"
> +#include "intel_de.h"
> #include "intel_display_types.h"
> #include "intel_dsi.h"
> #include "intel_dsi_vbt.h"
> +#include "intel_gmbus_regs.h"
> #include "vlv_dsi.h"
> #include "vlv_dsi_regs.h"
> #include "vlv_sideband.h"
> @@ -377,6 +379,75 @@ static void icl_exec_gpio(struct intel_connector *connector,
> drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Skipping ICL GPIO element execution\n");
> }
>
> +enum {
> + MIPI_RESET_1 = 0,
> + MIPI_AVDD_EN_1,
> + MIPI_BKLT_EN_1,
> + MIPI_AVEE_EN_1,
> + MIPI_VIO_EN_1,
> + MIPI_RESET_2,
> + MIPI_AVDD_EN_2,
> + MIPI_BKLT_EN_2,
> + MIPI_AVEE_EN_2,
> + MIPI_VIO_EN_2,
> +};
> +
> +static void icl_native_gpio_set_value(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> + int gpio, bool value)
> +{
> + int index;
> +
> + if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 11 && gpio >= MIPI_RESET_2))
> + return;
> +
> + switch (gpio) {
> + case MIPI_RESET_1:
> + case MIPI_RESET_2:
> + index = gpio == MIPI_RESET_1 ? HPD_PORT_A : HPD_PORT_B;
> +
> + /* Disable HPD to set the pin to output, and set output value */
> + intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, SHOTPLUG_CTL_DDI,
> + SHOTPLUG_CTL_DDI_HPD_ENABLE(index) |
> + SHOTPLUG_CTL_DDI_HPD_OUTPUT_DATA(index),
> + value ? SHOTPLUG_CTL_DDI_HPD_OUTPUT_DATA(index) : 0);
This looks like it could race with hpd irq handling/setup. Assuming
one of the pins could be used for DSI and other for eg. HDMI.
> + break;
> + case MIPI_AVDD_EN_1:
> + case MIPI_AVDD_EN_2:
> + index = gpio == MIPI_AVDD_EN_1 ? 0 : 1;
> +
> + intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, PP_CONTROL(index), PANEL_POWER_ON,
> + value ? PANEL_POWER_ON : 0);
> + break;
> + case MIPI_BKLT_EN_1:
> + case MIPI_BKLT_EN_2:
> + index = gpio == MIPI_AVDD_EN_1 ? 0 : 1;
> +
> + intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, PP_CONTROL(index), EDP_BLC_ENABLE,
> + value ? EDP_BLC_ENABLE : 0);
> + break;
> + case MIPI_AVEE_EN_1:
> + case MIPI_AVEE_EN_2:
> + index = gpio == MIPI_AVEE_EN_1 ? 1 : 2;
> +
> + intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GPIO(dev_priv, index),
> + GPIO_CLOCK_VAL_OUT,
> + GPIO_CLOCK_DIR_MASK | GPIO_CLOCK_DIR_OUT |
> + GPIO_CLOCK_VAL_MASK | (value ? GPIO_CLOCK_VAL_OUT : 0));
> + break;
> + case MIPI_VIO_EN_1:
> + case MIPI_VIO_EN_2:
> + index = gpio == MIPI_VIO_EN_1 ? 1 : 2;
> +
> + intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GPIO(dev_priv, index),
> + GPIO_DATA_VAL_OUT,
> + GPIO_DATA_DIR_MASK | GPIO_DATA_DIR_OUT |
> + GPIO_DATA_VAL_MASK | (value ? GPIO_DATA_VAL_OUT : 0));
> + break;
> + default:
> + MISSING_CASE(gpio);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static const u8 *mipi_exec_gpio(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi, const u8 *data)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = intel_dsi->base.base.dev;
> @@ -384,8 +455,7 @@ static const u8 *mipi_exec_gpio(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi, const u8 *data)
> struct intel_connector *connector = intel_dsi->attached_connector;
> u8 gpio_source, gpio_index = 0, gpio_number;
> bool value;
> -
> - drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "\n");
> + bool native = DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11;
>
> if (connector->panel.vbt.dsi.seq_version >= 3)
> gpio_index = *data++;
> @@ -398,10 +468,18 @@ static const u8 *mipi_exec_gpio(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi, const u8 *data)
> else
> gpio_source = 0;
>
> + if (connector->panel.vbt.dsi.seq_version >= 4 && *data & BIT(1))
> + native = false;
> +
> /* pull up/down */
> value = *data++ & 1;
>
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
> + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "GPIO index %u, number %u, source %u, native %s, set to %s\n",
> + gpio_index, gpio_number, gpio_source, str_yes_no(native), str_on_off(value));
> +
> + if (native)
> + icl_native_gpio_set_value(dev_priv, gpio_number, value);
> + else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
> icl_exec_gpio(connector, gpio_source, gpio_index, value);
> else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv))
> vlv_exec_gpio(connector, gpio_source, gpio_number, value);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 2b7a63754e4d..7008d04a06b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -5965,6 +5965,7 @@
>
> #define SHOTPLUG_CTL_DDI _MMIO(0xc4030)
> #define SHOTPLUG_CTL_DDI_HPD_ENABLE(hpd_pin) (0x8 << (_HPD_PIN_DDI(hpd_pin) * 4))
> +#define SHOTPLUG_CTL_DDI_HPD_OUTPUT_DATA(hpd_pin) (0x4 << (_HPD_PIN_DDI(hpd_pin) * 4))
> #define SHOTPLUG_CTL_DDI_HPD_STATUS_MASK(hpd_pin) (0x3 << (_HPD_PIN_DDI(hpd_pin) * 4))
> #define SHOTPLUG_CTL_DDI_HPD_NO_DETECT(hpd_pin) (0x0 << (_HPD_PIN_DDI(hpd_pin) * 4))
> #define SHOTPLUG_CTL_DDI_HPD_SHORT_DETECT(hpd_pin) (0x1 << (_HPD_PIN_DDI(hpd_pin) * 4))
> --
> 2.34.1
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list