[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 2/5] drm/i915/gt: Drop invalidate_csb_entries
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Mon Feb 7 11:57:43 UTC 2022
On 04/02/2022 16:37, Michael Cheng wrote:
> Drop invalidate_csb_entries and directly call drm_clflush_virt_range.
> This allows for one less function call, and prevent complier errors when
> building for non-x86 architectures.
>
> v2(Michael Cheng): Drop invalidate_csb_entries function and directly
> invoke drm_clflush_virt_range. Thanks to Tvrtko for the
> sugguestion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Cheng <michael.cheng at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c | 12 +++---------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
> index 9bb7c863172f..7500c06562da 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
> @@ -1646,12 +1646,6 @@ cancel_port_requests(struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists,
> return inactive;
> }
>
> -static void invalidate_csb_entries(const u64 *first, const u64 *last)
> -{
> - clflush((void *)first);
> - clflush((void *)last);
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Starting with Gen12, the status has a new format:
> *
> @@ -1999,7 +1993,7 @@ process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, struct i915_request **inactive)
> * the wash as hardware, working or not, will need to do the
> * invalidation before.
> */
> - invalidate_csb_entries(&buf[0], &buf[num_entries - 1]);
> + drm_clflush_virt_range(&buf[0], num_entries * sizeof(buf[0]));
>
> /*
> * We assume that any event reflects a change in context flow
> @@ -2783,8 +2777,8 @@ static void reset_csb_pointers(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>
> /* Check that the GPU does indeed update the CSB entries! */
> memset(execlists->csb_status, -1, (reset_value + 1) * sizeof(u64));
> - invalidate_csb_entries(&execlists->csb_status[0],
> - &execlists->csb_status[reset_value]);
> + drm_clflush_virt_range(&execlists->csb_status[0],
> + sizeof(&execlists->csb_status[reset_value]));
Hm I thought we covered this already, should be:
drm_clflush_virt_range(&execlists->csb_status[0],
execlists->csb_size * sizeof(execlists->csb_status[0]));
Regards,
Tvrtko
>
> /* Once more for luck and our trusty paranoia */
> ENGINE_WRITE(engine, RING_CONTEXT_STATUS_PTR,
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list