[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/selftests: add drm buddy smoke testcase
Matthew Auld
matthew.auld at intel.com
Tue Feb 8 10:22:50 UTC 2022
On 03/02/2022 13:32, Arunpravin wrote:
> - add a test to ascertain that the critical functionalities
> of the program is working fine
> - add a timeout helper function
>
> Signed-off-by: Arunpravin <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam at amd.com>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/selftests/drm_buddy_selftests.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_buddy.c | 143 ++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 144 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/drm_buddy_selftests.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/drm_buddy_selftests.h
> index b14f04a1de19..411d072cbfc5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/drm_buddy_selftests.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/drm_buddy_selftests.h
> @@ -11,3 +11,4 @@ selftest(buddy_alloc_limit, igt_buddy_alloc_limit)
> selftest(buddy_alloc_range, igt_buddy_alloc_range)
> selftest(buddy_alloc_optimistic, igt_buddy_alloc_optimistic)
> selftest(buddy_alloc_pessimistic, igt_buddy_alloc_pessimistic)
> +selftest(buddy_alloc_smoke, igt_buddy_alloc_smoke)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_buddy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_buddy.c
> index e97f583ed0cd..2074e8c050a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_buddy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_buddy.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/prime_numbers.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/signal.h>
>
> #include <drm/drm_buddy.h>
>
> @@ -15,6 +16,9 @@
> #define TESTS "drm_buddy_selftests.h"
> #include "drm_selftest.h"
>
> +#define IGT_TIMEOUT(name__) \
> + unsigned long name__ = jiffies + MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT
> +
> static unsigned int random_seed;
>
> static inline u64 get_size(int order, u64 chunk_size)
> @@ -22,6 +26,26 @@ static inline u64 get_size(int order, u64 chunk_size)
> return (1 << order) * chunk_size;
> }
>
> +__printf(2, 3)
> +static bool __igt_timeout(unsigned long timeout, const char *fmt, ...)
> +{
> + va_list va;
> +
> + if (!signal_pending(current)) {
> + cond_resched();
> + if (time_before(jiffies, timeout))
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + if (fmt) {
> + va_start(va, fmt);
> + vprintk(fmt, va);
> + va_end(va);
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> static inline const char *yesno(bool v)
> {
> return v ? "yes" : "no";
> @@ -314,6 +338,125 @@ static void igt_mm_config(u64 *size, u64 *chunk_size)
> *size = (u64)s << 12;
> }
>
> +static int igt_buddy_alloc_smoke(void *arg)
> +{
> + u64 mm_size, min_page_size, chunk_size, start = 0;
> + unsigned long flags = 0;
> + struct drm_buddy mm;
> + int *order;
> + int err, i;
> +
> + DRM_RND_STATE(prng, random_seed);
> + IGT_TIMEOUT(end_time);
> +
> + igt_mm_config(&mm_size, &chunk_size);
> +
> + err = drm_buddy_init(&mm, mm_size, chunk_size);
> + if (err) {
> + pr_err("buddy_init failed(%d)\n", err);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + order = drm_random_order(mm.max_order + 1, &prng);
> + if (!order)
> + goto out_fini;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i <= mm.max_order; ++i) {
> + struct drm_buddy_block *block;
> + int max_order = order[i];
> + bool timeout = false;
> + LIST_HEAD(blocks);
> + u64 total, size;
> + LIST_HEAD(tmp);
> + int order;
> +
> + err = igt_check_mm(&mm);
> + if (err) {
> + pr_err("pre-mm check failed, abort\n");
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + order = max_order;
> + total = 0;
> +
> + do {
> +retry:
> + size = min_page_size = get_size(order, chunk_size);
> + err = drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, start, mm_size, size,
> + min_page_size, &tmp, flags);
> + if (err) {
> + if (err == -ENOMEM) {
> + pr_info("buddy_alloc hit -ENOMEM with order=%d\n",
> + order);
> + } else {
> + if (order--) {
> + err = 0;
> + goto retry;
> + }
> +
> + pr_err("buddy_alloc with order=%d failed(%d)\n",
> + order, err);
> + }
> +
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + block = list_first_entry_or_null(&tmp,
> + struct drm_buddy_block,
> + link);
> + if (!block) {
> + pr_err("alloc_blocks has no blocks\n");
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + list_del(&block->link);
> + list_add_tail(&block->link, &blocks);
Could just make this list_move_tail()? Elsewhere also.
Anyway,
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
> +
> + if (drm_buddy_block_order(block) != order) {
> + pr_err("buddy_alloc order mismatch\n");
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + total += drm_buddy_block_size(&mm, block);
> +
> + if (__igt_timeout(end_time, NULL)) {
> + timeout = true;
> + break;
> + }
> + } while (total < mm.size);
> +
> + if (!err)
> + err = igt_check_blocks(&mm, &blocks, total, false);
> +
> + drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &blocks);
> +
> + if (!err) {
> + err = igt_check_mm(&mm);
> + if (err)
> + pr_err("post-mm check failed\n");
> + }
> +
> + if (err || timeout)
> + break;
> +
> + cond_resched();
> + }
> +
> + if (err == -ENOMEM)
> + err = 0;
> +
> + if (!err)
> + pr_info("%s - succeeded\n", __func__);
> +
> + kfree(order);
> +out_fini:
> + drm_buddy_fini(&mm);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static int igt_buddy_alloc_pessimistic(void *arg)
> {
> u64 mm_size, size, min_page_size, start = 0;
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list