[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Split pre-icl vs. icl+ SAGV hooks apart
Ville Syrjala
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Mon Feb 14 09:18:10 UTC 2022
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
To further reduce the confusion between the pre-icl vs. icl+
SAGV codepaths let's do a full split.
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 068870b17c43..8b70cdc3b58b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3785,34 +3785,44 @@ intel_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
return 0;
}
-void intel_sagv_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
+static void skl_sagv_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(state->base.dev);
+ const struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state =
+ intel_atomic_get_new_bw_state(state);
+
+ if (!new_bw_state)
+ return;
+
+ if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(i915, new_bw_state))
+ intel_disable_sagv(i915);
+}
+
+static void skl_sagv_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(state->base.dev);
+ const struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state =
+ intel_atomic_get_new_bw_state(state);
+
+ if (!new_bw_state)
+ return;
+
+ if (intel_can_enable_sagv(i915, new_bw_state))
+ intel_enable_sagv(i915);
+}
+
+static void icl_sagv_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
- const struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state;
- const struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state;
- u32 new_mask = 0;
+ const struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state =
+ intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
+ const struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state =
+ intel_atomic_get_new_bw_state(state);
+ u32 new_mask;
- /*
- * Just return if we can't control SAGV or don't have it.
- * This is different from situation when we have SAGV but just can't
- * afford it due to DBuf limitation - in case if SAGV is completely
- * disabled in a BIOS, we are not even allowed to send a PCode request,
- * as it will throw an error. So have to check it here.
- */
- if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv))
- return;
-
- new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_new_bw_state(state);
if (!new_bw_state)
return;
- if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 11) {
- if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state))
- intel_disable_sagv(dev_priv);
- return;
- }
-
- old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
/*
* Nothing to mask
*/
@@ -3837,34 +3847,18 @@ void intel_sagv_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
icl_pcode_restrict_qgv_points(dev_priv, new_mask);
}
-void intel_sagv_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
+static void icl_sagv_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
- const struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state;
- const struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state;
+ const struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state =
+ intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
+ const struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state =
+ intel_atomic_get_new_bw_state(state);
u32 new_mask = 0;
- /*
- * Just return if we can't control SAGV or don't have it.
- * This is different from situation when we have SAGV but just can't
- * afford it due to DBuf limitation - in case if SAGV is completely
- * disabled in a BIOS, we are not even allowed to send a PCode request,
- * as it will throw an error. So have to check it here.
- */
- if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv))
- return;
-
- new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_new_bw_state(state);
if (!new_bw_state)
return;
- if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 11) {
- if (intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state))
- intel_enable_sagv(dev_priv);
- return;
- }
-
- old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
/*
* Nothing to unmask
*/
@@ -3882,6 +3876,46 @@ void intel_sagv_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
icl_pcode_restrict_qgv_points(dev_priv, new_mask);
}
+void intel_sagv_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(state->base.dev);
+
+ /*
+ * Just return if we can't control SAGV or don't have it.
+ * This is different from situation when we have SAGV but just can't
+ * afford it due to DBuf limitation - in case if SAGV is completely
+ * disabled in a BIOS, we are not even allowed to send a PCode request,
+ * as it will throw an error. So have to check it here.
+ */
+ if (!intel_has_sagv(i915))
+ return;
+
+ if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 11)
+ icl_sagv_pre_plane_update(state);
+ else
+ skl_sagv_pre_plane_update(state);
+}
+
+void intel_sagv_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(state->base.dev);
+
+ /*
+ * Just return if we can't control SAGV or don't have it.
+ * This is different from situation when we have SAGV but just can't
+ * afford it due to DBuf limitation - in case if SAGV is completely
+ * disabled in a BIOS, we are not even allowed to send a PCode request,
+ * as it will throw an error. So have to check it here.
+ */
+ if (!intel_has_sagv(i915))
+ return;
+
+ if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 11)
+ icl_sagv_post_plane_update(state);
+ else
+ skl_sagv_post_plane_update(state);
+}
+
static bool skl_crtc_can_enable_sagv(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
--
2.34.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list