[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Pimp icl+ sagv pre/post update
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Mon Feb 14 10:27:30 UTC 2022
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 12:00:11PM +0200, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:18:11AM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Add some debugs on what exactly we're doing to the QGV point mask
> > in the icl+ sagv pre/post plane update hooks. Currently we're just
> > guessing.
> >
> > Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> Weird I think, I had those debugs initially. Definitely remember
> there was something similar. Was it kinda removed later?
Can't immediately see any such debugs being added or removed
by any commit.
>
> Stan
>
> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com>
>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index 8b70cdc3b58b..5d1f1a9988bb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@ -3818,26 +3818,22 @@ static void icl_sagv_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
> > const struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state =
> > intel_atomic_get_new_bw_state(state);
> > - u32 new_mask;
> > + u32 old_mask, new_mask;
> >
> > if (!new_bw_state)
> > return;
> >
> > - /*
> > - * Nothing to mask
> > - */
> > - if (new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask == old_bw_state->qgv_points_mask)
> > - return;
> > -
> > + old_mask = old_bw_state->qgv_points_mask;
> > new_mask = old_bw_state->qgv_points_mask | new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask;
> >
> > - /*
> > - * If new mask is zero - means there is nothing to mask,
> > - * we can only unmask, which should be done in unmask.
> > - */
> > - if (!new_mask)
> > + if (old_mask == new_mask)
> > return;
> >
> > + WARN_ON(!new_bw_state->base.changed);
> > +
> > + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Restricting QGV points: 0x%x -> 0x%x\n",
> > + old_mask, new_mask);
> > +
> > /*
> > * Restrict required qgv points before updating the configuration.
> > * According to BSpec we can't mask and unmask qgv points at the same
> > @@ -3854,19 +3850,22 @@ static void icl_sagv_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> > intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
> > const struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state =
> > intel_atomic_get_new_bw_state(state);
> > - u32 new_mask = 0;
> > + u32 old_mask, new_mask;
> >
> > if (!new_bw_state)
> > return;
> >
> > - /*
> > - * Nothing to unmask
> > - */
> > - if (new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask == old_bw_state->qgv_points_mask)
> > - return;
> > -
> > + old_mask = old_bw_state->qgv_points_mask | new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask;
> > new_mask = new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask;
> >
> > + if (old_mask == new_mask)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + WARN_ON(!new_bw_state->base.changed);
> > +
> > + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Relaxing QGV points: 0x%x -> 0x%x\n",
> > + old_mask, new_mask);
> > +
> > /*
> > * Allow required qgv points after updating the configuration.
> > * According to BSpec we can't mask and unmask qgv points at the same
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list