[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915: Fix cursor coordinates on bigjoiner slave

[Navare, Manasi]

On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 10:39:56AM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 07:25:36PM -0800, Navare, Manasi wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 08:31:57PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Adjust the cursor dst coordinates appripriately when it's on
> > > the bigjoiner slave pipe. intel_atomic_plane_check_clipping()
> > > already did this but with the cursor we discard those results
> > > (apart from uapi.visible and error checks) since the hardware
> > > will be doing the clipping for us.
> > > 
> > > v2: Rebase due to bigjoiner bitmask usage
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c | 3 +++
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c
> > > index 2ade8fdd9bdd..3e80763aa828 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c
> > > @@ -152,6 +152,9 @@ static int intel_check_cursor(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > >  	/* Use the unclipped src/dst rectangles, which we program to hw */
> > >  	plane_state->uapi.src = src;
> > >  	plane_state->uapi.dst = dst;
> > > +	if (intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(crtc_state))
> > > +		drm_rect_translate(&plane_state->uapi.dst,
> > > +				   -crtc_state->pipe_src_w, 0);
> > 
> > So this is basically to offset the cursor position from say 3860 to 0, 3861 to 1 ....7680 to 3860 for the right half
> > of the screen right?
> > And without this, it will just keep it at first rectangle?
> 
> Yes. The original rectangle came from userspace and is thus
> relative to the whole area covered by all the joined pipes.
> But the plane coordinates we hand to the hardware must be
> relative to their respective pipe.
> 
> It's a bit ugly as is but works for now. The last patch make
> this much nicer by removing all the assumptions here about
> the relative positions of the pipes.

Okay yes makes sens,

Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>

Manasi

> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel