[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/i915/gem: Don't try to map and fence large scanout buffers (v8)
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Thu Feb 17 09:19:15 UTC 2022
On 17/02/2022 07:50, Vivek Kasireddy wrote:
> On platforms capable of allowing 8K (7680 x 4320) modes, pinning 2 or
> more framebuffers/scanout buffers results in only one that is mappable/
> fenceable. Therefore, pageflipping between these 2 FBs where only one
> is mappable/fenceable creates latencies large enough to miss alternate
> vblanks thereby producing less optimal framerate.
>
> This mainly happens because when i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane()
> is called to pin one of the FB objs, the associated vma is identified
> as misplaced and therefore i915_vma_unbind() is called which unbinds and
> evicts it. This misplaced vma gets subseqently pinned only when
> i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww() is called without PIN_MAPPABLE. This
> results in a latency of ~10ms and happens every other vblank/repaint cycle.
> Therefore, to fix this issue, we try to see if there is space to map
> at-least two objects of a given size and return early if there isn't. This
> would ensure that we do not try with PIN_MAPPABLE for any objects that
> are too big to map thereby preventing unncessary unbind.
>
> Testcase:
> Running Weston and weston-simple-egl on an Alderlake_S (ADLS) platform
> with a 8K at 60 mode results in only ~40 FPS. Since upstream Weston submits
> a frame ~7ms before the next vblank, the latencies seen between atomic
> commit and flip event are 7, 24 (7 + 16.66), 7, 24..... suggesting that
> it misses the vblank every other frame.
>
> Here is the ftrace snippet that shows the source of the ~10ms latency:
> i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane() {
> 0.102 us | i915_gem_object_set_cache_level();
> i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww() {
> 0.390 us | i915_vma_instance();
> 0.178 us | i915_vma_misplaced();
> i915_vma_unbind() {
> __i915_active_wait() {
> 0.082 us | i915_active_acquire_if_busy();
> 0.475 us | }
> intel_runtime_pm_get() {
> 0.087 us | intel_runtime_pm_acquire();
> 0.259 us | }
> __i915_active_wait() {
> 0.085 us | i915_active_acquire_if_busy();
> 0.240 us | }
> __i915_vma_evict() {
> ggtt_unbind_vma() {
> gen8_ggtt_clear_range() {
> 10507.255 us | }
> 10507.689 us | }
> 10508.516 us | }
>
> v2: Instead of using bigjoiner checks, determine whether a scanout
> buffer is too big by checking to see if it is possible to map
> two of them into the ggtt.
>
> v3 (Ville):
> - Count how many fb objects can be fit into the available holes
> instead of checking for a hole twice the object size.
> - Take alignment constraints into account.
> - Limit this large scanout buffer check to >= Gen 11 platforms.
>
> v4:
> - Remove existing heuristic that checks just for size. (Ville)
> - Return early if we find space to map at-least two objects. (Tvrtko)
> - Slightly update the commit message.
>
> v5: (Tvrtko)
> - Rename the function to indicate that the object may be too big to
> map into the aperture.
> - Account for guard pages while calculating the total size required
> for the object.
> - Do not subject all objects to the heuristic check and instead
> consider objects only of a certain size.
> - Do the hole walk using the rbtree.
> - Preserve the existing PIN_NONBLOCK logic.
> - Drop the PIN_MAPPABLE check while pinning the VMA.
>
> v6: (Tvrtko)
> - Return 0 on success and the specific error code on failure to
> preserve the existing behavior.
>
> v7: (Ville)
> - Drop the HAS_GMCH(i915), DISPLAY_VER(i915) < 11 and
> size < ggtt->mappable_end / 4 checks.
> - Drop the redundant check that is based on previous heuristic.
>
> v8:
> - Make sure that we are holding the mutex associated with ggtt vm
> as we traverse the hole nodes.
>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 2e10187cd0a0..db00e71ce328 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
> #include "gem/i915_gem_pm.h"
> #include "gem/i915_gem_region.h"
> #include "gem/i915_gem_userptr.h"
> +#include "gem/i915_gem_tiling.h"
> #include "gt/intel_engine_user.h"
> #include "gt/intel_gt.h"
> #include "gt/intel_gt_pm.h"
> @@ -879,6 +880,92 @@ static void discard_ggtt_vma(struct i915_vma *vma)
> spin_unlock(&obj->vma.lock);
> }
>
> +static int
> +i915_gem_object_fits_in_aperture(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> + u64 alignment, u64 flags)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(obj->base.dev);
> + struct i915_ggtt *ggtt = to_gt(i915)->ggtt;
> + struct drm_mm_node *hole;
> + u64 hole_start, hole_end, start, end;
> + u64 fence_size, fence_alignment;
> + unsigned int count = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * If the required space is larger than the available
> + * aperture, we will not able to find a slot for the
> + * object and unbinding the object now will be in
> + * vain. Worse, doing so may cause us to ping-pong
> + * the object in and out of the Global GTT and
> + * waste a lot of cycles under the mutex.
> + */
> + if (obj->base.size > ggtt->mappable_end)
> + return -E2BIG;
> +
> + /*
> + * If NONBLOCK is set the caller is optimistically
> + * trying to cache the full object within the mappable
> + * aperture, and *must* have a fallback in place for
> + * situations where we cannot bind the object. We
> + * can be a little more lax here and use the fallback
> + * more often to avoid costly migrations of ourselves
> + * and other objects within the aperture.
> + */
> + if (!(flags & PIN_NONBLOCK))
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * Other objects such as batchbuffers are fairly small compared
> + * to FBs and are unlikely to exahust the aperture space.
> + * Therefore, return early if this obj is not an FB.
> + */
> + if (!i915_gem_object_is_framebuffer(obj))
> + return 0;
> +
> + fence_size = i915_gem_fence_size(i915, obj->base.size,
> + i915_gem_object_get_tiling(obj),
> + i915_gem_object_get_stride(obj));
> +
> + if (i915_vm_has_cache_coloring(&ggtt->vm))
> + fence_size += 2 * I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE;
> +
> + fence_alignment = i915_gem_fence_alignment(i915, obj->base.size,
> + i915_gem_object_get_tiling(obj),
> + i915_gem_object_get_stride(obj));
> + alignment = max_t(u64, alignment, fence_alignment);
> +
> + /*
> + * Assuming this object is a large scanout buffer, we try to find
> + * out if there is room to map at-least two of them. There could
> + * be space available to map one but to be consistent, we try to
> + * avoid mapping/fencing any of them.
> + */
> + mutex_lock(&ggtt->vm.mutex);
Ah.. in which case I think pattern from i915_vma_pin_ww should be
copied, ie:
err = mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(&ggtt->vm.mutex, 0);
Regards,
Tvrtko
> + drm_mm_for_each_suitable_hole(hole, &ggtt->vm.mm, 0, ggtt->mappable_end,
> + fence_size, DRM_MM_INSERT_LOW) {
> + hole_start = drm_mm_hole_node_start(hole);
> + hole_end = hole_start + hole->hole_size;
> +
> + do {
> + start = round_up(hole_start, alignment);
> + end = min_t(u64, hole_end, ggtt->mappable_end);
> +
> + if (range_overflows(start, fence_size, end))
> + break;
> +
> + if (++count >= 2) {
> + mutex_unlock(&ggtt->vm.mutex);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + hole_start = start + fence_size;
> + } while (1);
> + }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&ggtt->vm.mutex);
> + return -ENOSPC;
> +}
> +
> struct i915_vma *
> i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
> @@ -894,36 +981,9 @@ i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>
> if (flags & PIN_MAPPABLE &&
> (!view || view->type == I915_GGTT_VIEW_NORMAL)) {
> - /*
> - * If the required space is larger than the available
> - * aperture, we will not able to find a slot for the
> - * object and unbinding the object now will be in
> - * vain. Worse, doing so may cause us to ping-pong
> - * the object in and out of the Global GTT and
> - * waste a lot of cycles under the mutex.
> - */
> - if (obj->base.size > ggtt->mappable_end)
> - return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
> -
> - /*
> - * If NONBLOCK is set the caller is optimistically
> - * trying to cache the full object within the mappable
> - * aperture, and *must* have a fallback in place for
> - * situations where we cannot bind the object. We
> - * can be a little more lax here and use the fallback
> - * more often to avoid costly migrations of ourselves
> - * and other objects within the aperture.
> - *
> - * Half-the-aperture is used as a simple heuristic.
> - * More interesting would to do search for a free
> - * block prior to making the commitment to unbind.
> - * That caters for the self-harm case, and with a
> - * little more heuristics (e.g. NOFAULT, NOEVICT)
> - * we could try to minimise harm to others.
> - */
> - if (flags & PIN_NONBLOCK &&
> - obj->base.size > ggtt->mappable_end / 2)
> - return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
> + ret = i915_gem_object_fits_in_aperture(obj, alignment, flags);
> + if (ret)
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> }
>
> new_vma:
> @@ -935,10 +995,6 @@ i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> if (flags & PIN_NONBLOCK) {
> if (i915_vma_is_pinned(vma) || i915_vma_is_active(vma))
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
> -
> - if (flags & PIN_MAPPABLE &&
> - vma->fence_size > ggtt->mappable_end / 2)
> - return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
> }
>
> if (i915_vma_is_pinned(vma) || i915_vma_is_active(vma)) {
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list