[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: SAGV fixes (rev2)
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Fri Feb 18 04:41:30 UTC 2022
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 08:03:41PM -0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> Series: drm/i915: SAGV fixes (rev2)
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/100091/
> State : failure
> == Summary ==
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11239_full -> Patchwork_22302_full
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_22302_full absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in Patchwork_22302_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> Participating hosts (11 -> 11)
> No changes in participating hosts
> Possible new issues
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_22302_full:
> ### IGT changes ###
> #### Possible regressions ####
> * igt at kms_cursor_legacy@all-pipes-forked-bo:
> - shard-iclb: [PASS] -> [INCOMPLETE] +10 similar issues
Argh. These are due to the extra debug spam from
intel_bw_atomic_check() since that now goes throug the full function
a lot more.
So either we just nuke a bunch of those debugs, or I guess we do it a
bit more like what Stan suggested and try to check more carefully if the
inputs to to the QGV calculation actually changed.
I guess I'll try the latter approach, in case those debugs are actually
useful. The challenge will be doing that and keeping the patch looking
reasonable for stable...
More information about the Intel-gfx