[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/6] drm/i915: Fix bw atomic check when switching between SAGV vs. no SAGV
Ville Syrjala
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Fri Feb 18 06:40:35 UTC 2022
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
If the only thing that is changing is SAGV vs. no SAGV but
the number of active planes and the total data rates end up
unchanged we currently bail out of intel_bw_atomic_check()
early and forget to actually compute the new WGV point
mask and thus won't actually enable/disable SAGV as requested.
This ends up poorly if we end up running with SAGV enabled
when we shouldn't. Usually ends up in underruns.
To fix this let's go through the QGV point mask computation
if either the data rates/number of planes, or the state
of SAGV is changing.
v2: Check more carefully if things are changing to avoid
the extra calculations/debugs from introducing unwanted
overhead
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com> #v1
Fixes: 20f505f22531 ("drm/i915: Restrict qgv points which don't have enough bandwidth.")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
index 7bbe0dc5926b..1fd1d2182d8f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
@@ -830,6 +830,7 @@ int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
unsigned int max_bw_point = 0, max_bw = 0;
unsigned int num_qgv_points = dev_priv->max_bw[0].num_qgv_points;
unsigned int num_psf_gv_points = dev_priv->max_bw[0].num_psf_gv_points;
+ bool changed = false;
u32 mask = 0;
/* FIXME earlier gens need some checks too */
@@ -873,6 +874,8 @@ int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
new_bw_state->data_rate[crtc->pipe] = new_data_rate;
new_bw_state->num_active_planes[crtc->pipe] = new_active_planes;
+ changed = true;
+
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"pipe %c data rate %u num active planes %u\n",
pipe_name(crtc->pipe),
@@ -880,7 +883,19 @@ int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
new_bw_state->num_active_planes[crtc->pipe]);
}
- if (!new_bw_state)
+ old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
+ new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_new_bw_state(state);
+
+ if (new_bw_state &&
+ intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, old_bw_state) !=
+ intel_can_enable_sagv(dev_priv, new_bw_state))
+ changed = true;
+
+ /*
+ * If none of our inputs (data rates, number of active
+ * planes, SAGV yes/no) changed then nothing to do here.
+ */
+ if (!changed)
return 0;
ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
@@ -966,7 +981,6 @@ int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
*/
new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask = ~allowed_points & mask;
- old_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
/*
* If the actual mask had changed we need to make sure that
* the commits are serialized(in case this is a nomodeset, nonblocking)
--
2.34.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list