[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/tgl: Simply subplatform detection

Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Tue Feb 22 12:01:50 UTC 2022


On 22/02/2022 08:27, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> On 21/02/2022 19:10, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
>> In the past we had a need to differentiate TGL U and TGL Y, there
>> was a different voltage swing table for each subplatform and some PCI
>> ids of this subplatforms are shared but it turned out that it was a
>> specification mistake and the voltage swing table was indeed the same
>> but we went ahead with that patch because we needed to differentiate
>> TGL U and Y from TGL H and by that time TGL H was embargoed so that
>> was the perfect way to land it upstream.
>>
>> Now the embargo for TGL H is long past and now we even have
>> INTEL_TGL_12_GT1_IDS with all TGL H ids, so we can drop this PCI root
>> check and only rely in the PCI ids to differentiate TGL U and Y from
>> TGL H that actually has code differences.
>>
>> Besides the simplification this will fix issues in virtualization
>> environments where the PCI root is virtualized and don't have the same
>> id as actual hardware.
>>
>> Cc: Fred Gao <fred.gao at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
>> ---
>>   .../drm/i915/display/intel_ddi_buf_trans.c    |  2 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h               |  9 +++------
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h               |  6 ------
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c      | 20 +------------------
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c             |  2 +-
>>   5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi_buf_trans.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi_buf_trans.c
>> index 0c32210bf5031..934a9f9e7dabb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi_buf_trans.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi_buf_trans.c
>> @@ -1321,7 +1321,7 @@ tgl_get_combo_buf_trans_dp(struct intel_encoder 
>> *encoder,
>>       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
>>       if (crtc_state->port_clock > 270000) {
>> -        if (IS_TGL_U(dev_priv) || IS_TGL_Y(dev_priv)) {
>> +        if (IS_TGL_UY(dev_priv)) {
>>               return intel_get_buf_trans(&tgl_uy_combo_phy_trans_dp_hbr2,
>>                              n_entries);
>>           } else {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> index 1c2f4ae4ebf98..c5eb2a3a1a590 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> @@ -1147,12 +1147,9 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private 
>> *i915,
>>   #define IS_ICL_WITH_PORT_F(dev_priv) \
>>       IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_ICELAKE, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_PORTF)
>> -#define IS_TGL_U(dev_priv) \
>> +#define IS_TGL_UY(dev_priv) \
>>       IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_TIGERLAKE, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_ULT)
>> -#define IS_TGL_Y(dev_priv) \
>> -    IS_SUBPLATFORM(dev_priv, INTEL_TIGERLAKE, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_ULX)
>> -
>>   #define IS_SKL_GRAPHICS_STEP(p, since, until) (IS_SKYLAKE(p) && 
>> IS_GRAPHICS_STEP(p, since, until))
>>   #define IS_KBL_GRAPHICS_STEP(dev_priv, since, until) \
>> @@ -1170,11 +1167,11 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private 
>> *i915,
>>        IS_DISPLAY_STEP(__i915, since, until))
>>   #define IS_TGL_UY_GRAPHICS_STEP(__i915, since, until) \
>> -    ((IS_TGL_U(__i915) || IS_TGL_Y(__i915)) && \
>> +    (IS_TGL_UY(__i915) && \
>>        IS_GRAPHICS_STEP(__i915, since, until))
>>   #define IS_TGL_GRAPHICS_STEP(__i915, since, until) \
>> -    (IS_TIGERLAKE(__i915) && !(IS_TGL_U(__i915) || IS_TGL_Y(__i915)) 
>> && \
>> +    (IS_TIGERLAKE(__i915) && !IS_TGL_UY(__i915)) && \
>>        IS_GRAPHICS_STEP(__i915, since, until))
>>   #define IS_RKL_DISPLAY_STEP(p, since, until) \
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> index 2b8a3086ed35a..30aa1d99f2244 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> @@ -8823,12 +8823,6 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
>>   #define   DSB_ENABLE            (1 << 31)
>>   #define   DSB_STATUS            (1 << 0)
>> -#define TGL_ROOT_DEVICE_ID        0x9A00
>> -#define TGL_ROOT_DEVICE_MASK        0xFF00
>> -#define TGL_ROOT_DEVICE_SKU_MASK    0xF
>> -#define TGL_ROOT_DEVICE_SKU_ULX        0x2
>> -#define TGL_ROOT_DEVICE_SKU_ULT        0x4
>> -
>>   #define CLKREQ_POLICY            _MMIO(0x101038)
>>   #define  CLKREQ_POLICY_MEM_UP_OVRD    REG_BIT(1)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>> index ae13bc3c7970e..4329828b0db25 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>> @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ static const u16 subplatform_ult_ids[] = {
>>       INTEL_WHL_U_GT3_IDS(0),
>>       INTEL_CML_U_GT1_IDS(0),
>>       INTEL_CML_U_GT2_IDS(0),
>> +    INTEL_TGL_12_GT2_IDS(0),
>>   };
>>   static const u16 subplatform_ulx_ids[] = {
>> @@ -243,25 +244,6 @@ void intel_device_info_subplatform_init(struct 
>> drm_i915_private *i915)
>>           mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G12);
>>       }
>> -    if (IS_TIGERLAKE(i915)) {
>> -        struct pci_dev *root, *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev);
>> -
>> -        root = list_first_entry(&pdev->bus->devices, typeof(*root), 
>> bus_list);
>> -
>> -        drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, mask);
>> -        drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, (root->device & TGL_ROOT_DEVICE_MASK) !=
>> -                TGL_ROOT_DEVICE_ID);
>> -
>> -        switch (root->device & TGL_ROOT_DEVICE_SKU_MASK) {
>> -        case TGL_ROOT_DEVICE_SKU_ULX:
>> -            mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_ULX);
>> -            break;
>> -        case TGL_ROOT_DEVICE_SKU_ULT:
>> -            mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_ULT);
>> -            break;
>> -        }
>> -    }
> 
> Hmm 1d3cc7ab2b00 ("drm/i915/tgl: Set subplatforms") should have declared 
> it was using the subtplatform bits. Now I suggest you add this to 
> intel_device_info.h for documentation purposes:
> 
> /* TGL */
> #define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_ULT   (0)

Should have wrote INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_UY to match the naming of new macros 
from this patch.

Regards,

Tvrtko

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tvrtko
> 
>> -
>>       GEM_BUG_ON(mask & ~INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_MASK);
>>       RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->platform_mask[pi] |= mask;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
>> index ac1a796b28084..4fd69ecd14811 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
>> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ void intel_step_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>>       } else if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(i915)) {
>>           revids = rkl_revids;
>>           size = ARRAY_SIZE(rkl_revids);
>> -    } else if (IS_TGL_U(i915) || IS_TGL_Y(i915)) {
>> +    } else if (IS_TGL_UY(i915)) {
>>           revids = tgl_uy_revids;
>>           size = ARRAY_SIZE(tgl_uy_revids);
>>       } else if (IS_TIGERLAKE(i915)) {


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list