[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] treewide: remove dereference of list iterator after loop body

[Jakob Koschel]

The list iterator variable will be a bogus pointer if no break was hit.
Dereferencing it could load *any* out-of-bounds/undefined value
making it unsafe to use that in the comparision to determine if the
specific element was found.

This is fixed by using a separate list iterator variable for the loop
and only setting the original variable if a suitable element was found.
Then determing if the element was found is simply checking if the
variable is set.

Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel at gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/base.c | 11 +++++++----
 drivers/scsi/wd719x.c                          | 12 ++++++++----
 fs/f2fs/segment.c                              |  9 ++++++---
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/base.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/base.c
index 57199be082fd..c56cd9e59a66 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/base.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/base.c
@@ -471,20 +471,23 @@ nvkm_pstate_new(struct nvkm_clk *clk, int idx)
 static int
 nvkm_clk_ustate_update(struct nvkm_clk *clk, int req)
 {
-	struct nvkm_pstate *pstate;
+	struct nvkm_pstate *pstate = NULL;
+	struct nvkm_pstate *tmp;
 	int i = 0;

 	if (!clk->allow_reclock)
 		return -ENOSYS;

 	if (req != -1 && req != -2) {
-		list_for_each_entry(pstate, &clk->states, head) {
-			if (pstate->pstate == req)
+		list_for_each_entry(tmp, &clk->states, head) {
+			if (tmp->pstate == req) {
+				pstate = tmp;
 				break;
+			}
 			i++;
 		}

-		if (pstate->pstate != req)
+		if (!pstate)
 			return -EINVAL;
 		req = i;
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/wd719x.c b/drivers/scsi/wd719x.c
index 1a7947554581..be270ed8e00d 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/wd719x.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/wd719x.c
@@ -684,11 +684,15 @@ static irqreturn_t wd719x_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	case WD719X_INT_SPIDERFAILED:
 		/* was the cmd completed a direct or SCB command? */
 		if (regs.bytes.OPC == WD719X_CMD_PROCESS_SCB) {
-			struct wd719x_scb *scb;
-			list_for_each_entry(scb, &wd->active_scbs, list)
-				if (SCB_out == scb->phys)
+			struct wd719x_scb *scb = NULL;
+			struct wd719x_scb *tmp;
+
+			list_for_each_entry(tmp, &wd->active_scbs, list)
+				if (SCB_out == tmp->phys) {
+					scb = tmp;
 					break;
-			if (SCB_out == scb->phys)
+				}
+			if (scb)
 				wd719x_interrupt_SCB(wd, regs, scb);
 			else
 				dev_err(&wd->pdev->dev, "card returned invalid SCB pointer\n");
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 1dabc8244083..a3684385e04a 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -356,16 +356,19 @@ void f2fs_drop_inmem_page(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
 	struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
 	struct list_head *head = &fi->inmem_pages;
 	struct inmem_pages *cur = NULL;
+	struct inmem_pages *tmp;

 	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !page_private_atomic(page));

 	mutex_lock(&fi->inmem_lock);
-	list_for_each_entry(cur, head, list) {
-		if (cur->page == page)
+	list_for_each_entry(tmp, head, list) {
+		if (tmp->page == page) {
+			cur = tmp;
 			break;
+		}
 	}

-	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, list_empty(head) || cur->page != page);
+	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !cur);
 	list_del(&cur->list);
 	mutex_unlock(&fi->inmem_lock);

--
2.25.1