[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Flip guc_id allocation partition
Matthew Brost
matthew.brost at intel.com
Tue Jan 11 16:30:19 UTC 2022
Move the multi-lrc guc_id from the lower allocation partition (0 to
number of multi-lrc guc_ids) to upper allocation partition (number of
single-lrc to max guc_ids).
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
---
.../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 57 ++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
index 9989d121127df..1bacc9621cea8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
@@ -147,6 +147,8 @@ guc_create_parallel(struct intel_engine_cs **engines,
*/
#define NUMBER_MULTI_LRC_GUC_ID(guc) \
((guc)->submission_state.num_guc_ids / 16)
+#define NUMBER_SINGLE_LRC_GUC_ID(guc) \
+ ((guc)->submission_state.num_guc_ids - NUMBER_MULTI_LRC_GUC_ID(guc))
/*
* Below is a set of functions which control the GuC scheduling state which
@@ -1776,11 +1778,6 @@ int intel_guc_submission_init(struct intel_guc *guc)
INIT_WORK(&guc->submission_state.destroyed_worker,
destroyed_worker_func);
- guc->submission_state.guc_ids_bitmap =
- bitmap_zalloc(NUMBER_MULTI_LRC_GUC_ID(guc), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!guc->submission_state.guc_ids_bitmap)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
spin_lock_init(&guc->timestamp.lock);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&guc->timestamp.work, guc_timestamp_ping);
guc->timestamp.ping_delay = (POLL_TIME_CLKS / gt->clock_frequency + 1) * HZ;
@@ -1796,7 +1793,8 @@ void intel_guc_submission_fini(struct intel_guc *guc)
guc_flush_destroyed_contexts(guc);
guc_lrc_desc_pool_destroy(guc);
i915_sched_engine_put(guc->sched_engine);
- bitmap_free(guc->submission_state.guc_ids_bitmap);
+ if (guc->submission_state.guc_ids_bitmap)
+ bitmap_free(guc->submission_state.guc_ids_bitmap);
}
static inline void queue_request(struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine,
@@ -1863,6 +1861,33 @@ static void guc_submit_request(struct i915_request *rq)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
}
+static int new_mlrc_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, struct intel_context *ce)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_context_is_parent(ce));
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!guc->submission_state.guc_ids_bitmap);
+
+ ret = bitmap_find_free_region(guc->submission_state.guc_ids_bitmap,
+ NUMBER_MULTI_LRC_GUC_ID(guc),
+ order_base_2(ce->parallel.number_children
+ + 1));
+ if (likely(!(ret < 0)))
+ ret += NUMBER_SINGLE_LRC_GUC_ID(guc);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int new_slrc_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, struct intel_context *ce)
+{
+ GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_parent(ce));
+
+ return ida_simple_get(&guc->submission_state.guc_ids,
+ 0, NUMBER_SINGLE_LRC_GUC_ID(guc),
+ GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL |
+ __GFP_NOWARN);
+}
+
static int new_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, struct intel_context *ce)
{
int ret;
@@ -1870,16 +1895,10 @@ static int new_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, struct intel_context *ce)
GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_child(ce));
if (intel_context_is_parent(ce))
- ret = bitmap_find_free_region(guc->submission_state.guc_ids_bitmap,
- NUMBER_MULTI_LRC_GUC_ID(guc),
- order_base_2(ce->parallel.number_children
- + 1));
+ ret = new_mlrc_guc_id(guc, ce);
else
- ret = ida_simple_get(&guc->submission_state.guc_ids,
- NUMBER_MULTI_LRC_GUC_ID(guc),
- guc->submission_state.num_guc_ids,
- GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL |
- __GFP_NOWARN);
+ ret = new_slrc_guc_id(guc, ce);
+
if (unlikely(ret < 0))
return ret;
@@ -1989,6 +2008,14 @@ static int pin_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, struct intel_context *ce)
GEM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&ce->guc_id.ref));
+ if (unlikely(intel_context_is_parent(ce) &&
+ !guc->submission_state.guc_ids_bitmap)) {
+ guc->submission_state.guc_ids_bitmap =
+ bitmap_zalloc(NUMBER_MULTI_LRC_GUC_ID(guc), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!guc->submission_state.guc_ids_bitmap)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
try_again:
spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->submission_state.lock, flags);
--
2.34.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list