[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH v3 i-g-t 11/15] tests/i915/i915_hangman: Don't let background contexts cause a ban
Matthew Brost
matthew.brost at intel.com
Thu Jan 13 21:01:08 UTC 2022
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 11:59:43AM -0800, John.C.Harrison at Intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
>
> The global context used by all the subtests for causing hangs is
> marked as unbannable. However, some of the subtests set background
> spinners running on all engines using a freshly created context. If
> there is a test failure for any reason, all of those spinners can be
> killed off as hanging contexts. On systems with lots of engines, that
> can result in the test being banned from creating any new contexts.
>
> So make the spinner contexts unbannable as well. That way if one
> subtest fails it won't necessarily bring down all subsequent subtests.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
> ---
> tests/i915/i915_hangman.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_hangman.c b/tests/i915/i915_hangman.c
> index 9f7f8062c..567eb71ee 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/i915_hangman.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/i915_hangman.c
> @@ -284,6 +284,21 @@ static void test_error_state_capture(const intel_ctx_t *ctx,
> check_alive();
> }
>
> +static void context_unban(int fd, unsigned ctx)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_gem_context_param param = {
> + .ctx_id = ctx,
> + .param = I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_BANNABLE,
Looking at the kernel I don't see how I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_BANNABLE can
return -EINVAL unless it is protected context.
> + .value = 0,
> + };
> +
> + if(__gem_context_set_param(fd, ¶m) == -EINVAL) {
> + igt_assert_eq(param.value, 0);
> + param.param = I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_BAN_PERIOD;
Also this always returns -EINVAL.
Probably can just go with:
gem_context_set_param on original parameters.
Matt
> + gem_context_set_param(fd, ¶m);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void
> test_engine_hang(const intel_ctx_t *ctx,
> const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, unsigned int flags)
> @@ -307,6 +322,7 @@ test_engine_hang(const intel_ctx_t *ctx,
> num_ctx = 0;
> for_each_ctx_engine(device, ctx, other) {
> local_ctx[num_ctx] = intel_ctx_create(device, &ctx->cfg);
> + context_unban(device, local_ctx[num_ctx]->id);
> ahndN = get_reloc_ahnd(device, local_ctx[num_ctx]->id);
> spin = __igt_spin_new(device,
> .ahnd = ahndN,
> --
> 2.25.1
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list