[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/1] drm/i915/pxp: Hold RPM wakelock during PXP unbind

Vivi, Rodrigo rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Tue Jan 18 14:11:16 UTC 2022


On Mon, 2022-01-17 at 13:21 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 12:02:36PM -0800, Juston Li wrote:
> > > Similar to commit b8d8436840ca ("drm/i915/gt: Hold RPM wakelock
> > > during
> > > PXP suspend") but to fix the same warning for unbind during
> > > shutdown:
> > > 
> > > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > RPM wakelock ref not held during HW access
> > > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 4139 at
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h:115
> > > gen12_fwtable_write32+0x1b7/0
> > > Modules linked in: 8021q ccm rfcomm cmac algif_hash
> > > algif_skcipher
> > > af_alg uinput snd_hda_codec_hdmi vf industrialio iwl7000_mac80211
> > > cros_ec_sensorhub lzo_rle lzo_compress zram iwlwifi cfg80211
> > > joydev
> > > CPU: 0 PID: 4139 Comm: halt Tainted: G     U  W
> > > 5.10.84 #13 344e11e079c4a03940d949e537eab645f6
> > > RIP: 0010:gen12_fwtable_write32+0x1b7/0x200
> > > Code: 48 c7 c7 fc b3 b5 89 31 c0 e8 2c f3 ad ff 0f 0b e9 04 ff ff
> > > ff c6
> > > 05 71 e9 1d 01 01 48 c7 c7 d67
> > > RSP: 0018:ffffa09ec0bb3bb0 EFLAGS: 00010246
> > > RAX: 12dde97bbd260300 RBX: 00000000000320f0 RCX: ffffffff89e60ea0
> > > RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000ffffdfff RDI: ffffffff89e60e70
> > > RBP: ffffa09ec0bb3bd8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffa09ec0bb3950
> > > R10: 00000000ffffdfff R11: ffffffff89e91160 R12: 0000000000000000
> > > R13: 0000000028121969 R14: ffff9515c32f0990 R15: 0000000040000000
> > > FS:  0000790dcf225740(0000) GS:ffff951737800000(0000)
> > > knlGS:0000000000000000
> > > CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > > CR2: 000058b25efae147 CR3: 0000000133ea6001 CR4: 0000000000770ef0
> > > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> > > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff07f0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> > > PKRU: 55555554
> > > Call Trace:
> > >  intel_pxp_fini_hw+0x2f/0x39
> > >  i915_pxp_tee_component_unbind+0x1c/0x42
> > >  component_unbind+0x32/0x48
> > >  component_unbind_all+0x80/0x9d
> > >  take_down_master+0x24/0x36
> > >  component_master_del+0x56/0x70
> > >  mei_pxp_remove+0x2c/0x68
> > >  mei_cl_device_remove+0x35/0x68
> > >  device_release_driver_internal+0x100/0x1a1
> > >  mei_cl_bus_remove_device+0x21/0x79
> > >  mei_cl_bus_remove_devices+0x3b/0x51
> > >  mei_stop+0x3b/0xae
> > >  mei_me_shutdown+0x23/0x58
> > >  device_shutdown+0x144/0x1d3
> > >  kernel_power_off+0x13/0x4c
> > >  __se_sys_reboot+0x1d4/0x1e9
> > >  do_syscall_64+0x43/0x55
> > >  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> > > RIP: 0033:0x790dcf316273
> > > Code: 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f
> > > 44 00
> > > 00 89 fa be 69 19 12 28 bf ad8
> > > RSP: 002b:00007ffca0df9198 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX:
> > > 00000000000000a9
> > > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000004321fedc RCX: 0000790dcf316273
> > > RDX: 000000004321fedc RSI: 0000000028121969 RDI: 00000000fee1dead
> > > RBP: 00007ffca0df9200 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: 0000563ce8cd8970
> > > R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007ffca0df9308
> > > R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000003
> > > ---[ end trace 2f501b01b348f114 ]---
> > > ACPI: Preparing to enter system sleep state S5
> > > reboot: Power down
> > > 
> > > Changes since v1:
> > >  - Rebase to latest drm-tip
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 0cfab4cb3c4e ("drm/i915/pxp: Enable PXP power management")
> > > Suggested-by: Lee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee at intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Juston Li <juston.li at intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
> > > <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> > 
> > and pushing to drm-intel-next right now.
> > 
> > Thanks for the patch.
> 
> As it happens, this had already been pushed to drm-intel-gt-next by
> John:

doh! (facepalm)
sorry for the mistake this should be really in -gt-next
luckly no conflicts so the propagation should be transparent,
but lesson learned...

> 
> commit 57ded5fc98b11d76dae505ca3591b61c9dbbbda7
> Author:     Juston Li <juston.li at intel.com>
> AuthorDate: Thu Jan 6 12:02:36 2022 -0800
> Commit:     John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
> CommitDate: Fri Jan 7 15:30:23 2022 -0800
> 
>     drm/i915/pxp: Hold RPM wakelock during PXP unbind
> 
> I don't know if the problem is common enough to warrant more checks.
> It
> does help to reply to the list when one pushes patches, and although
> at
> least I almost always do it, we haven't really made it a requirement
> either.
> 
> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c | 5 ++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c
> > > index 195b2323ec00..4b6f5655fab5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c
> > > @@ -107,9 +107,12 @@ static int
> > > i915_pxp_tee_component_bind(struct device *i915_kdev,
> > >  static void i915_pxp_tee_component_unbind(struct device
> > > *i915_kdev,
> > >                                           struct device
> > > *tee_kdev, void *data)
> > >  {
> > > +       struct drm_i915_private *i915 = kdev_to_i915(i915_kdev);
> > >         struct intel_pxp *pxp = i915_dev_to_pxp(i915_kdev);
> > > +       intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> > >  
> > > -       intel_pxp_fini_hw(pxp);
> > > +       with_intel_runtime_pm_if_in_use(&i915->runtime_pm,
> > > wakeref)
> > > +               intel_pxp_fini_hw(pxp);
> > >  
> > >         mutex_lock(&pxp->tee_mutex);
> > >         pxp->pxp_component = NULL;
> > > -- 
> > > 2.31.1
> > > 
> 



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list